Martian Canals or Martian Tubes?

originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: Blue Shift

That tube on mars had a light on the inside in one of the photos, of course NASA would likely to cover up such a thing as they did with the air on mars.

Well, then how can you trust them about anything, including that there are tubes to begin with? How do you even know they've sent probes to Mars? A lot of people think they haven't. Where do you draw the line about what you think is true? If you're only going to believe stuff is true that you already believe is true, you can't believe anything.

originally posted by: Blue Shift
Seems unlikely, because if you follow them, they don't seem to go anywhere.

As the thread suggest, the tubes, like the canals, go UNDERGROUND.

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

originally posted by: Blue Shift
Seems unlikely, because if you follow them, they don't seem to go anywhere.

As the thread suggest, the tubes, like the canals, go UNDERGROUND.

But they have to come up SOMEWHERE. And even underground cities need access to the outside world, and the ruins will show up on various visual, IR, X-ray and radar scans. WHICH THEY DON'T. The tunnels go nowhere. As if they were built by mob contractors.

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: Blue Shift

That tube on mars had a light on the inside in one of the photos, of course NASA would likely to cover up such a thing as they did with the air on mars.

Well, then how can you trust them about anything, including that there are tubes to begin with? How do you even know they've sent probes to Mars? A lot of people think they haven't. Where do you draw the line about what you think is true? If you're only going to believe stuff is true that you already believe is true, you can't believe anything.

There’s a difference between trusting “nothing” and trusting some things. Their commentary isn’t “all true” or “all lies” and I don’t just say this to forward/support the “ET Hypothesis”.

Think of it this way - if you’ve ever held a higher up position in a large company you know there’s the truth and then there’s what employees can handle/the official narrative. The truth is usually not wildly different than the official narrative - it’s just a spin on the “truth” that downplays or omits some information that the company doesn’t want getting out/could cause issues with employees/sales/brand/etc.

NASA is no different - it’s just a big company.

The missions/probes/etc. have occurred. Probably more of them than we know about. I suspect they found a lot more than they’ve told us - and once they found things that might be tough for people to handle - the cover/PR narrative kicked in e.g. “no air”, “uninhabitable”, “no tunnels”, “no water”, etc.

I’m not saying that all of those things exist definitively (air/water/etc.) but I suspect there’s a lot more going on there than the general public has been told about. Lots more.

a reply to: spiritualarchitect

Arrakis

so its really true about Arrakis

we must go for the melange

On a more serious note , I think those just look like sand dunes

originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: Blue Shift

That tube on mars had a light on the inside in one of the photos, of course NASA would likely to cover up such a thing as they did with the air on mars.

Of course it did.