Choosing animals over people., page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times


reply posted on 9-2-2013 @ 07:48 AM by Credenceskynyrd
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
reply to
post by chrome413



I would save a human being first.

I'd have to think about that first. Depends upon who it is.



depends on the animal as well, a tiger would eat you



reply posted on 9-2-2013 @ 10:27 AM by AuntieChrist
reply to post by Spookycolt





We had a huge feral cat problem...


Sounds more to me that the cats had a huge stoopid Human problem...

Careful that some intelligent E.T.´s don´t decide that there are "too many feral Humans" on your farm and give the Ceyotes a bonus snack.

One can only hope.
edit on 9-2-2013 by AuntieChrist because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-2-2013 @ 09:02 PM by Dragonfly79
Originally posted by lupodigubbio
Basically the deal is this, I have received a considerable amount beef (both from society and family) for spending so much time, effort, finances and energy in creating the shelter for animals instead of working on human facilities for any of the several issues in my 3rd world home.


First of all I don't fully belong to "y'all" since I'm from another country, from some town with values and traditions you probably haven't heard of much or know like you do your close ones. I believe a lot of people have lost a lot of this important thing you speak of but not all of humanity. And I love animals and I would like to have one but currently I'm having trouble taking care of myself so I appointed a few insects running around the house which I consider my pets, like a few spiders.

The honest answer is: I don't care that much about humans. I care more about animals. It sounds cold, it sounds unnatural but it's the truth. There is just something that we humans have lost and animals still have that I wish we still had. Innocence maybe? Or perhaps it is all the human brutality that I have seen inflicted to the shelter, farm and wild animals?


Brutality usually comes from people who are frustrated because something happened which they don't understand enough. Which doesn't make it right but since you have to work with inflicted animals. You know, humans are animals too, we just don't want to perceive ourselves as such and pretend we have something more which really we don't. Ok, humans made spaceshuttles and nuclear devices which other animals can't make, maybe one day other species will evolve and it would be like Planet of the Dogs and you have these dogs running around in clothes, having parties, weddings, religious ceremonies.

But I don't know about your care, even if you care just a little bit about other life but your own then nobody should be giving you beef. Unless you like to cook, make burgers out of it and feed it to others ofcourse.

This, of course, doesn't mean I hate human beings or I won't help out from time to time, but If I had to choose between helping a person or an animal in need I would probably find myself at a very difficult ethical crossroad. Based on past experiences, I would go with my gut and probably choose the animal.

Anybody feel this way?


No, pets are there for comfort and reminders and they are taken in after it becomes clear there isn't enough love to go around. But humans would go first as I am human but if I were a dog I would choose the dog, it's kind of an animal rule. I could understand people going for the pet/animal/nonhuman life because they have chosen to as their primary concern but once humans are gone so will pets. Unless it would happen in the middle of nowhere with nobody else around but then you would have less chance of survival.
edit on 11/2/2013 by Dragonfly79 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-2-2013 @ 09:11 PM by Dragonfly79
Originally posted by Credenceskynyrd
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
reply to
post by chrome413



I would save a human being first.

I'd have to think about that first. Depends upon who it is.



depends on the animal as well, a tiger would eat you


A tiger wouldn't necessarily eat a human, it depends more on how much food is around and if you are willing to share, like not taking more food than you should. And it depends on the tiger as well, if (s)he is in a good mood or not. Most importantly a lot depends on whoever owns the lands the tiger and you are on at the time of the actual encounter.
edit on 11/2/2013 by Dragonfly79 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hey You...Yeah, You...
  Posted 5 days ago with 82 member flags
Amazingly powerful video.. The real you - Alan Watts
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Matrix Unraveled ~ The Do\'s and Do Not\'s ~ !!!!!!
  Posted 12 days ago with 49 member flags
I Did 3 Bowls Today – I’m Flyin !
  Posted 10 days ago with 42 member flags
Animals Are As With-it as Humans (Animals Are Conscious)
  Posted 16 days ago with 41 member flags
Spirit Science; a full movie
  Posted 5 days ago with 21 member flags