Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Ex-officer suspect in California cop killing

page: 97
103
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   
reply to post by roadgravel
 





You'll make a fine sheep. Never reevaluate information or admit you might have interpreted something incorrectl


If you can equate that to sheeplism ? Then Baaa !




posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Actually it is just quite close minded. But it is your choice. I am OK with it.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   
There is a rumor in the news media pipeline that is ferociously trying to be confirmed or debunked by several media outlets: No human remains were found in the cabin.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by roadgravel
Actually it is just quite close minded. But it is your choice. I am OK with it.


See I have a problem with what you're saying. Closed minded would be applicable if I said I rarely change my conclusion even if I find reason. But what I said was I rarely find reason to change my conclusion. Not that I care how you choose to see it. But so others can see how you choose to skew what I said.

I have to remember to proof read .
edit on 13-2-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


You are saying you are almost always right and in no need of reevaluation. I would say that is close minded in what goes on reporting and fact finding in today's world. No really a twisting by me. I'll leave it at that.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:28 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 

not that i'm volunteering as a cheerleader or anything ... but i haven't changed my early opinion either ... baaaa-aaa-aa

oh yeah, it's been well over 6 hrs ... and we still don't know IF a body was recovered

come on people, surely y'all haven't become that distracted ?

i'm still trying to figure out how he 'hid' in Big Bear for nearly a week without detection.
drones and all, yet it took how many days to 'maybe' locate him ... just how gullible is the public these days?

hmmmm, 9/11/01 ... 6hrs after the first plane hit (3pm) ... were we in or out of the 'burning rubble' and had we retrieved bodies yet ??



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by roadgravel
reply to post by randyvs
 


You are saying you are almost always right and in no need of reevaluation. I would say that is close minded in what goes on reporting and fact finding in today's world. No really a twisting by me. I'll leave it at that.


Unacceptable. You can't interpret a ratio of developed beliefs to a closed mind. I never said anywhere I was right about anything. I could be completely wrong. As I said earlier Jim Phelps and his IMF crew could be involved. And I'll leave it at that.
edit on 13-2-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Not Jim Phelps
okay...now I get it...Thanks


j/k

ETA
In all seriousness I would still like to know what this was all about if your theory is right (which I think it is).
edit on 2/13/13 by ThePublicEnemyNo1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by ThePublicEnemyNo1
 





In all seriousness I would still like to know what this was all about if your theory is right (which I think it is).


I would like to know that as well. I can only guess. I will say this, if anyone here can find that answer it's Nick.

Imagine for a moment the reason behind all of this was an epic fail ?

BTW
Good thread OP !
edit on 13-2-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by NickDC202
 


Please keep us informed!
Very interesting if it's true. Yet another lie?



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by chiefsmom
reply to post by NickDC202
 


Please keep us informed!
Very interesting if it's true. Yet another lie?


Not much of an update but here is what I'm hearing: the rumor that no human remains were found in the cabin still cannot be confirmed or denied. This is very strange...



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 01:43 PM
link   
what news reports is this coming out on that no remains were recovered?



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by scottromansky
what news reports is this coming out on that no remains were recovered?


Toward the top of this page I wrote:




There is a rumor in the news media pipeline that is ferociously trying to be confirmed or debunked by several media outlets: No human remains were found in the cabin.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by scottromansky
what news reports is this coming out on that no remains were recovered?
the last published update from LAPD last evening was the last 'official' statement i read ... No body recovered. (was linked on 94 or 95 i think)

and, as i know nothing of the other 'media person' posting, he/she seems to be questioning the possibility that the statement still stands this afternoon.

ps ... does anyone know if the 'protection details' have been withdrawn ??
edit on 13-2-2013 by Honor93 because: add ps



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:00 PM
link   
cnn reports a body found

for what its worth drudge report is saying body found

fox news reports the same as well

abc news another one

confused as to where these rumors are coming from.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Honor93
 

LAPD chief today said some of the protection will stay in place...



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by scottromansky
 


I can clarify my earlier post regarding something that several MSM outlets continue to try to confirm or debunk has nothing to do with LE statements last night but cones from more recent info.



edit on 2/13/2013 by NickDC202 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:29 PM
link   
so basically he was either never in the building, or he escaped.



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by roadgravel
 


I wonder, IF he was killed, are they are doing that because he named names in his original manifesto and are afraid someone else will go after them?

Isn't the protection costing them a lot of money?
edit on 13-2-2013 by chiefsmom because: wording



posted on Feb, 13 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by NickDC202
 


Listening to the San Berdo county sheriffs live feed 7/8. I'm hearing the first report of a house fire woman screaming shots fired..

Most likely unrelated to Dorner but can't tell if it's Big Bear or not.

Unit just arrived.

Housing complex still can't get a make on the location.

Accidental house fire unrelated.
edit on 13-2-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
103
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join