It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Los Angeles police say they will reopen the disciplinary proceedings that led to the firing of a former officer who's wanted in three killings over the past several days.
Cmdr. Andrew Smith said Saturday that the department will reopen the investigation that apparently has led Christopher Dorner to seek revenge against former LAPD colleagues who he believed cost him his law enforcement career.
Dorner alleged in an online manifesto that he was wrongly fired for reporting that his training officer used excessive force.
Police Chief Charlie Beck tells KCBS-TV the department will thoroughly re-examine Dorner's allegation to ensure the public that the LAPD is fair and transparent. He says if Dorner wants to surrender, the LAPD will "be happy to hear what he has to say."
If he did, he better walk right into an attorneys office.. We know the LAPD will shoot on sight.. I would not trust Jesse Jackson but this guy probably can he is black.
Originally posted by ThePublicEnemyNo1
reply to post by gangdumstyle
Yeah...I saw that on CNN about an hour ago...what a change in tone if true
However, he should turn himself in...just not into the hands of any Law Enforcement anywhere! I was listening to I think it was local KNX am radio on the way home from work yesterday and Jesse Jackson was on the show saying he would work with Dorner and to contact I think the name he gave was Kenneth Blackwell.
I wouldn't trust Jesse Jackson with 5 cent coin!!!!! I do believe Dorner, should most definitely turn himself in.edit on 2/9/13 by ThePublicEnemyNo1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Nonchalant
What I dont get about this whole deal is why its been left to the LAPD to catch this guy?
A quick easy way to sort this guy out would be to send in a Special Forces team from the military. Half a dozen specialists should do it. They will not only be able to track him, but they would cut him down like a little bitch, and there would likely be no loss of life, except his, which he and no-one else cares about anyway.
Originally posted by theillusion
So, no-one has thought about a "false flag", "psyop"???
Originally posted by yourmaker
Originally posted by theillusion
So, no-one has thought about a "false flag", "psyop"???
Obviously you didn't read the 30x Randy mentioned it being a false flag.
In this thread mind you.
Originally posted by theillusion
We get SCREWED, with more laws and restrictions.
Originally posted by WhiteAlice
reply to post by ThePublicEnemyNo1
More information in regards to military records. As previously mentioned, my grandfather was a chief of staff, former atomic veteran, and held positions in military intelligence, SAC, MAC and MAJCOM. After he passed several years ago, my family attempted to try to comprehend all that he did while in service for 30+ years. His AF-11 holds a 13 year blanket statement of continuous service with no locations, no rank, no nothing. We tried to fill in that blank. Eventually, we attempted to obtain his full service record through FOIA requests and received a whopping 49 pages for those 30+ years of service. Two of them were duplicates and all were just lists of names, including his, for whenever he received a promotion, medal or other award and one piece of junk where he did some work with an officer's club. In other words, we received jack ****. Interestingly enough, we did receive most of his medical records, partially redacted (black lines) although the medical records for his dependents are sealed, even after FOIA request. My family was NOT pleased for understandable reasons.
Now, we were all raised to be paranoid as hell. Even when I was a kid, I was taught there were things that you don't discuss on the phone, period. Despite that, we all have land lines to fall back on "just in case" to replace our more typical wireless phone systems. What we haven't had has been military knocking on our doors. We get silence. Nothing, nil, nada. This for poking our noses as much as we can into a man whose security clearance was TS/SCI, like Dorner's purportedly was, and even talking about some of what is in his own personal files in a very public manner (ie. documentation of a trip to USSR with the USDA in 1973). The man was stationed at Roswell and Randolf AFB in his career. So, in contrast, it's been our experience that you get hit with a wall of silence and honestly, I don't think they care much whether somebody pokes around or not unless they are hacking computers. It's one person and the more outlandish the claim may seem, the more unlikely it is for anybody to listen. They truly do control all of the information. If something is out there, it's because they no longer give a rat's *** or figure that plausible deniability works for them.
A blank in a military record happens and it should be eyebrow raising, based on my personal experience. I'm curious as well as to what he was doing for those 3 years.
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by Nonchalant
What I dont get about this whole deal is why its been left to the LAPD to catch this guy?
A quick easy way to sort this guy out would be to send in a Special Forces team from the military. Half a dozen specialists should do it. They will not only be able to track him, but they would cut him down like a little bitch, and there would likely be no loss of life, except his, which he and no-one else cares about anyway.
In a word (actually two) : posse comitatus
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878:
20 Stat. L., 145
June 18, 1878
CHAP. 263 - An act making appropriations for the support of the Army for the fiscal year ending June thirtieth, eighteen hundred and seventy-nine, and for other purposes.
SEC. 15. From and after the passage of this act it shall not be lawful to employ any part of the Army of the United States, as a posse comitatus, or otherwise, for the purpose of executing the laws, except in such cases and under such circumstances as such employment of said force may be expressly authorized by the Constitution or by act of Congress; and no money appropriated by this act shall be used to pay any of the expenses incurred in the employment of any troops in violation of this section And any person willfully violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be punished by fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding two years or by both such fine and imprisonment.
www.dojgov.net...