It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by tremex
Depends on your hemisphere.
Just because you did poor and sloppy research is causing you to make a logical fallacy called an appeal from personal ignorance.
That's not a logical fallacy, because it doesn't involve any syllogism - you are trying to impress a wrong guy. Your reference to "sloppy research" is a lovely joke. If there is no source, there is no way of acquiring any data from it and therefore there is no research. But you are free to use that book which I don't have as an argument whenever you feel like it. Lol.
Well, thanks for the excursion to the Dark Ages.
In my book from 2001 I[Calleman] state that following this initial emergence the evolution of multicellular organisms would follow an alautun rhtythm of 63.1 million years.
The main problem with the 63.1 million year cycle you mention is that it appears to fit the evolution of multicellular organism. It also fits other periodicities so why does it associate with multicellular organisms? The time period almost also fit the time from the Chicxulub impact until today. Does that imply the Maya knew when the non-avian dinosaurs got extinct?