It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So ignore the connections and hold onto the book that you agree has been messed with. Flawless logic there.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Which could have EASILY been inserted after-the-fact. Like I said earlier, if I really wanted to, I could insert my name in the place of Jesus', all it would take was paper, a pen, and patience.
Did you just call your own logic flawed? I agree!
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Of course they would! Duh! Otherwise the lie would have been found out a long time ago! The church supporting the churches doctrines? Unheard of! /sarcasm
Could you maybe post some links that back up your claims?edit on 8-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So how could early church fathers have said Luke traveled with Paul when the church didn't exist? What were they "fathers" of exactly?
So you agree that what I said was flawed logic? So why do you keep incorporating it?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Links? Sources? Anything?
With all due respect, I've taken my search to the next level above skeptics. I've heard their objections and theories and searched out the rebuttals by conservative experts and theologians. Most of what I've ever seen from skeptics is they stop their search after what the detractors say and never search out the rebuttals.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by NOTurTypical
With all due respect, I've taken my search to the next level above skeptics. I've heard their objections and theories and searched out the rebuttals by conservative experts and theologians. Most of what I've ever seen from skeptics is they stop their search after what the detractors say and never search out the rebuttals.
Really?
Erm........what?!
Here, let's do a Madlib:
'Most of what I've ever seen from apologists is they stop their search after what the opponents say and never search out the rebuttals.'
My friend, I'm not the stuckbborn one here.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I've heard of them but not them mentioning Luke traveling with Paul. Could you point to a link or something that has it in writing? Specifically from those 3 people. I'm assuming since you mentioned them you know first hand that they mentioned Luke travelling with Paul.
Or should I just take your word for it?
So now the bible hasn't been messed with, only a certain type of bible. If the Alexandrian bible was messed with then how can you say the original wasn't? They were both paper and ink, right? Or did the canonized books use magical ink and paper that made it "hermetically sealed" as I've heard someone call it before?edit on 8-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)edit on 8-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)