It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by undo
i doubt that would be a sufficient litmus test for benevolence.
Just answer this one question if you would
If biblical god answered a believers prayer for a cancer cure, and that is an act of benevolence.... How is the unanswered prayers of the holocaust victims not then in contrast malevolence?
who has the right to tell another how to live if it is not hurting anyone?
Originally posted by DOLCOTT
reply to post by LittleByLittle
Small minded indeed, if you reason enough and repeat the lies enough you can find truth and justify anything and any behavior. Scripture like anything else can be twisted to fit anyones agenda. Take religion out of the conversation completely, in nature male and female for most species are required to reproduce. It was not natures intent that man lay with man nor women with women or the specie would die. Now my dog has been known to hump a few of his neighbors but, let him get a whiff of the female in heat and off he was to do his natural thing ( his now fixed so he cannot create any unwanted offspring) novel idea. Now with all the new agers and ascending to the next level are you now saying we are evolved into omnisexual beings and the male and female roles are no longer needed, I doubt that so based upon nature's laws homosexuality is not the norm.
Originally posted by lupodigubbio
Originally posted by rottensociety
reply to post by lupodigubbio
Subjectively, I think it's right that everyone be who they want to be.
Can't you see that they're using Homosexuality to help destroy Christianity? To destroy Individualism?
I understand your point, even though I don't see enough evidence for this Marxist conspiracy you wrote about. However, this little bit disturbs me.
Your above quote basically suggests Christiany = Individualism
Can you see what is wrong with this concept? Please elaborate, I'm honestly at a loss for words.
edit on 8-2-2013 by lupodigubbio because: typo
Originally posted by Toadmund
reply to post by rottensociety
"if men want to express femininity and vice versa" - Please don't jump on the "bandwagon", I never said this, if you read my post I said it was being pushed onto society. You must have noticed it on television and in music, it's everywhere.
Personally I think humans are born inherently moral and good and living within a good community guides us naturally, therefore we shouldn't need religion.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by rottensociety
Personally I think humans are born inherently moral and good and living within a good community guides us naturally, therefore we shouldn't need religion.
That just about encapsulates my very thoughts
Originally posted by kaylaluv
reply to post by CyberneticProphet
I stopped listening as soon as I heard "God abandons the darkened heart..." I guess those 20 children at Newtown Connecticut all had dark hearts. They were just babies, looking forward to Christmas and being with their mommies and daddies, but God abandoned them. They had their whole lives ahead of them, but God didn't allow it. If he wanted them in Heaven, why didn't he just keep them from being born into this world only to suffer? I'm sorry, but your sermons are hogwash. HOGWASH. Innocent people suffer around the world, and your God abandons them by allowing them to suffer.
There are gay people who have known they were gay since they were children. Innocent children. They hurt no one, just trying to find love and acceptance in the world they were born into, as we all do. And your god is abandoning them. Your god is a lousy god, and not one that I want to follow.
Gays don't want special rights. They want the same rights as everyone else - to be able to live in peace without being harassed or bullied by others; to be able to marry the person they love, to be able to be a boy scout if they choose. Being homosexual doesn't hurt anyone - it is between consenting adults, so you can't compare a gay person to a pedophile, or a rapist or a murderer or a thief.edit on 9-2-2013 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)
If you reject God you will end up in Hell. It's rather simple really.
Originally posted by CyberneticProphet
God gave mankind freewill to obey him or not. Adam and Eve chose not to so sin entered the world. They was deceived by Satan. He still does the same tricks today.
God never promised life in this world would be easy. People that blame God for everything have a misunderstanding about his nature.
If you reject God you will end up in Hell. It's rather simple really.
Originally posted by FaithandArms
Originally posted by Ewok_Boba
. Proposition 8 in California was to allow gay marriage in our state. It was rejected though. Do you know why? Because religious intolerants chose to express their disapproval by directly denying gays their right. They put aside the fact that this country was formed with the intention to separate church and state, and put their own selfish ideas in front of it.
Marriage is a religious based event. Government should have nothing to do with it. Honestly the government shouldn't recognize ANY marriages. If the government honestly believed in "separation of church and state" they would not issue marriage licenses (but they want the money), etc.
What should happen is that everyone who wants to be listed with the government as having a partnership with another individual gets a civil union. Civil Unions should be what the government acknowledges ONLY, for everyone. No marriage certificates, etc just walk in with another person and sign some paperwork.
Why would a gay person even want to be "married" since most religions don't support homosexuality? Don't try to force religions to accept and marry you. I find it weird that gays say they don't want to be judged and don't believe in religions, yet a lot of them want to be married by the religions that despise them. If gays want equal rights and tax breaks then they should support the change to civil unions for everyone.
It would clear up a lot of confusion and streamline the issue if the government just stepped out of that aspect of people's lives and said everyone has to come in, file a civil union tax form license and then threw out records of marriage licenses. If you were straight and wanted to get married and applied for a marriage license and they denied it for some reason, what gives the government the right to say you can't be married by your religion?
File a civil union with the government and if you belong to a religion and want that religion to marry you then you would go get a marriage license from that church or pastor, etc. The church would have your marriage on file and could upload it into a religious database if you wanted it seen or acknowledged by others. If your belief in your religion is genuine the only one that will matter to you really is your marriage license and church marriage, the government civil union license would simply be to get acknowledgement and monetary advantages from the government.
Get the government out of people's religious lives (but that won't happen since I agree with the other posters that this is all part of a larger global plan to diss any religion that isn't worshipping the elite)