Iraqi Child Asks Tony Blair and George Bush: Are you happy now?

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 10:02 AM
link   
Question: Has anyone ever seen Saddam or Osama, in person, or do you believe what you "saw" and were "told"? To me, Bush and Co. are nothing more than cheap people in expensive suits.




posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Spookycolt
reply to post by Britguy
 


So killing tens of thousands compared to the millions or so that Saddam did is worse?

Using gas against your people is better than what we did?

Saddam was robbing that country, at least now they have a better chance at being a part of the nation. Saddam conducted a pointless war for how many years against Iran?

This man was no savior to the people and was far worse in many regards than what the US did to them.


Do you genuinely believe that?

Really?

The US butchered Iraq. The US were monsters. Thousands of innocents murdered and you say it was better for them.



posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 10:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Spookycolt
reply to post by Britguy
 


So killing tens of thousands compared to the millions or so that Saddam did is worse?


Do you know how many Iraqis have died at the hands of Western intervention? More than Saddam ever killed..



posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Saddam was accused by the US of killing citizens in his nation close to 300 thousand during his reign as the leader, in a span of decades, but forgot to add that among this many was included the wars that Saddam fought with neighboring countries.

While Bush was very happy to downplay the numbers of "casualties of war" "collateral damage" to his benefits, making sure that no death by war accounts were kept during the first years of the conflict.

But at the end the numbers were as greater than Saddam supposedly slaughter and close to half a million Iraqis due to invasion, in only a few years, no decades, we may never know as is no "mass grave to dig to count them out"



posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 08:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy

Originally posted by Spookycolt
reply to post by Britguy
 


So killing tens of thousands compared to the millions or so that Saddam did is worse?

Using gas against your people is better than what we did?

Saddam was robbing that country, at least now they have a better chance at being a part of the nation. Saddam conducted a pointless war for how many years against Iran?

This man was no savior to the people and was far worse in many regards than what the US did to them.


Rofl, you're clueless, aren't you? We did them a service by blowing up 1.7 million Iraqis? We did them a service by using depleted uranium shells which will remain in the area for billions of years causing birth defects and lifelong health problems? Because, you know, uranium is safer and more humanitarian than gas. That "pointless war" was encouraged and funded by us, or do you not know where Saddam got his weapons?

Oh no, Saddam was a bad leader! He was a bad leader, guys! We did them a service by sticking around for nearly a decade after Saddam died and obliterating their families! Yeah!!! AMRIKUAAWWW DA BEST NASHUN IN DA WURRRLD!!!! FREEDUM BRINGERZZZZZ!!! LIBURTEE AND JUSHTISH!!!! BAAAAAAWWWWWWWWW BAAAWWWWWW!!


Actually,it was not 1.7 million dead iraqis. That BRITISH OPINION POLL WAS DEBUNKED. Hell 3 agencies two of them non western studied it in detail. Even wikipedia(yeah the historically in accurate wiki) said a number way way smaller than 1.7 million dead. And TUNGSTEN STEEL is DEADLIER than DU would you have rather they used that? Yeah the war was a Doosh move but at least be truthful with the death tolls



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 01:54 AM
link   
an't watch it right now, but the fact that another child understood and recognized the gruesome errors the grown-ups made in the past is sad enough for me..


Why not..





 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join