Massive Airship Off to a Flying Start, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 6-2-2013 @ 05:52 AM by smyleegrl
Greetings, ATS!

From
Discovery News:



Montabello, Calif.-based Aeros is working on a rigid airship that can fly like a plane and float like a balloon. If realized, the 500-foot-long Aeroscraft would greatly alter the way cargo is shipped. The craft is designed to take off vertically and cruise at up to 130 miles an hour at an altitude of 12,000 feet. It will be able to travel thousands of miles on a single tank of fuel, carrying 66 tons of cargo -- that's three times the capacity of a C-130 and half that of the C-5, the largest military aircraft flown by the United States. "This vehicle doesn't need infrastructure," Munir Tojo-Verge, the flight control systems engineer at Aeros, told Discovery News. "It could even land on water."


After reading the article, sounds like the airship is more for transporting cargo than people. One thing I found interesting was that the cost was comparable to that of a helicopter. Interesting stuff.

Can you imagine seeing one of these behemoths? Probably would show up here, via youtube, on the aliens and ufo forum.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 06:02 AM by Z32Driver
reply to post by smyleegrl


That is pretty friggin cool.
I always thought they should have never shelved blimp/zeppelin technology.
Makes ya wonder if they can carry all that cargo if they wont be turned into flying aircraft (possibly drone) carriers..
Remember these???
LINK

Maybe i just play too much Crimson Skies.

Z32Driver



reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 06:40 AM by Spookycolt
reply to post by jimmiec



Yea, I don't think so.

Try backing a blimp like this into a back of Wal-mart to unload their cargo.

Probably not going to happen.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 06:44 AM by Spookycolt
reply to post by Tardacus



Well the article didn't state why they are not being made bigger but that would solve the problem of its relatively small amount of cargo space on this version.

The article did say that in the future they may make them able to carry far more. And it does appear they are far safer than they were in the past so that problem is worked out.

I suppose if you built them at a massive scale and built distribution centers they may be be worthwhile but the investment in all that over simply using a current train seems cost prohibitive.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 06:54 AM by DonOdie
reply to post by LeLeu



What you remember was actually called "Project Walrus" by DARPA and aimed on creating a heavy lift strategic air transport. The project was cancelled in 2010, however, if you look at pictures from the Walrus project, it pretty much looks like the article the OP is referring to is a mark II or even III version of the Walrus.

Few years back, Germany tried to go down the same road with the ambitious Cago Lifter project. Sadly, all that's left of it is a giant hangar that is now a theme park. If I recall it correctly, a huge problem with the Cargo Lifter was that they weren't able to stabilize it in relatively weak side winds and subsequently, failing to produce a working prototype, the company went bankrupt.

I think it's a really cool idea and I hope these guys will stick to it and we'll soon see those things roam the sky.



reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 07:06 AM by pjduplooy
Originally posted by Z32Driver
reply to
post by smyleegrl


That is pretty friggin cool.
I always thought they should have never shelved blimp/zeppelin technology.
Makes ya wonder if they can carry all that cargo if they wont be turned into flying aircraft (possibly drone) carriers..
Remember these???
LINK

Maybe i just play too much Crimson Skies.

Z32Driver



Gee, are there actually people still playing Crimson Skies? I just installed it again last night after digging up all my older games. I know its off topic so please excuse


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 07:24 AM by jimmiec
reply to post by Spookycolt



Actually each state could have a hub to deliver to and fuel/maintain the airships.. This would eliminate long haul trucking of merchandise. It would not totally eliminate semi trucks. They would haul it from the hub to the store. That would give truck drivers more time with their families. It is a win win situation.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 07:52 AM by jimmiec
reply to post by Spookycolt



True, but it would also create new jobs. Truck drivers pay would have to be restructured is all. I would think long haul truck drivers would be happy to have a life again.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 11:04 AM by darknull
reply to post by jimmiec



no the truck drivers would not be happy the would make less money if not become obsolete. The whole reason anyone gets into long haul is the good pay for being gone for long periods of time to support said family. If there only moving in one state they lose money end of story man I have plenty of family members who are truckers and if that was the plan and truckers found out the interstates would be shut down by semi and it is completely possible if they wanted to do it


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 12:15 PM by jimmiec
reply to post by darknull



I know a few truckers. One was a long haul driver for 10 years. He came to Houston and took a job hauling rice from Houston to Louisiana. He drove it twice a day and was home every evening. He made just as much as the long haul. He was happy about it. They can only drive so many hours anyway before they have to stop to rest. That is by law.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Avro Arrow resurfacing?
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Nasa:Silent and Efficient Supersonic Bi-Directional Flying Wing
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Can anyone shed any light on what this aircraft may be doing?
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Impressive Climb Rate of The F-14A+ and F-14D
  Posted 18 days ago with 1 member flags
ufo???
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags