It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
quote: 1. Asket and Nera hoax...(Swiss MIBs switched 'em...indeed )
Where is the evidence of this. Can you please link me to both sides of the argument.
quote: 2. Time travel photos hoaxes (shown to come from other sources)
Don't no anything about this. Not seen mentioned on his site.
quote: 3. Video (a noticeable wobble as if hanging from a string)
UFO's wobbling is not that surprising. I have seen other accounts that show how UFO's wobble when changing speed or direction, or tilting on their axis.
quote: 4. That one man can have SO many sightings, and get such pictures, and of a variety of craft, when most never even have one sighting.
Well, the difference being he is a "contact" and has worked with the Pleadians in his past life. Remember, not all men are of the same spiritual development.
quote: 5. The practice of him insisting on meeting the aliens "alone" and having his "followers" wait for him.
Even if that were true, there would have been someone whose curiosity got the better of him, and snooped on him. Is there someone?
According to Michael Horn there have been dozens of witnesses who have seen the beamships. You are the only one so far who says otherwise. Can I have a link?
quote: 6. The fact that the photos are obviously of smaller objects close to the lens. Many of his photos are so obviously fake that it's a miracle he was ever taken seriously.
Is that not for the photograhic analysis to decide. According to which, they are not obvious, nor fake, in fact genuine. The fact that they remain irreproducable to date, and the ones that have been produced, in age of computer photoediting, have not been tested, nor look as convincing to me, carry more weight than mere incredulity.
quote: Need I really go on....???
Yes, until he is disproven.
quote: Thanks for the reminder. I'll so after the holiday (will be busy this weekend, so little time to look up his predictions again to do a proper post).
Originally posted by Gazrok
I know we've got a few threads on this...but this is in direct response to questions in another thread...
The existence of ETs for me is a closed-book anyhow. I guess now you've given me reason to research on him. Talk later.
A �prophecy� on Reagan�
�A man, who due to his future actions, will align everything toward the purpose, to allow the old prophecies to be fulfilled, which will result in the fact, that slowly but surely everything on Earth will widen into a world-wide war.�
WRONG � There was no World War during his presidency nor even soon afterwards. We are now a couple decades after his presidency, so any war now would be the result of the most recent presidents, not Reagan. Indeed, I�d beg to argue that if Reagan was president right now, 911 wouldn�t have even occurred.
Originally posted by merka
Well I dissagree with the claim that this deliberate hoax project proves that Meiers photos are real... Once you figure something out, you can replicate it. If you figure out how to make the perfect illusion, you can do it again. But granted, Meiers photos ARE much more realistic across the board.
Anyway, just one curious question, you said:
Also, there isn't a general standard by
which the case can be judged.Most people just proceed on the basis
what they find likely without doing some serious research.
I've met Mr Horn's acquintance on the FIGU discussion board a few
years ago.Certainly he's an accomplished speaker and writer, not to
mention an intelligent man.Yet, in my opinion, his efforts sometimes
reach blind fanatical proportions where setting standards is used
selectively.
Yet there's also the possibility that in scientific circles a certain subject was already discussed and remained
hypothetical untill proven and publicized.Mr Meier could have taken the
hypothetical matter at hand and commented about them in his contact
notes before it was official knowledge.
Secondly some of Billy Meier's prophecies are rather vague.Meaning
that several positive interpretations or outcomes can be applied to it.
Meaning that if you want to see something in the prophecies you're
likely to succeed, just like in astrology.
I've also seen prophecies by Billy Meier that were downright incorrect,
scientificly or as a chain of events that would happen in the future.
Of course Mr Horn doesn't show you those.In one contact note the
start of world war III is described.Russia invades Europe and civic
upheavals start in France and other countries.For me, it looked like
the entire story was written in a cold war mindset.When I looked
at the date when the prophecy was publicized it was in the 1980's,
before the fall of the Berlin wall and the communist block.Nowdays
that prophecy seems incorrect and of little value.Russia isn't going
to invade Europe nor are there any possible conflicts on the horizon.
In retrospect the entire prophecized chain of events seems just
inaccurate and false.
So, what to make of the Meier case? Is he a prophet? To be honest,
I think it's what a person does with the information and knowledge
which greatly influences the outcome.
If Meier really hoaxed this by himself, then he would have to have constructed huge life-size models of UFO's. Then he would have to have suspended it with a huge crane. Then manipulated the photographs in a lab, and used some form of digital editing. Any of the following can be easily caught in scientific photographic analysis. A small-time farmer, in the middle of nowhere, 30 years ago, could not have done this.
I have no found any vague predictions yet.
�And it will be that the fanatics of Islam will rise up and cover the lands of Europe with war, all will shake and quiver� (applied to be proof of foreseeing the Spain Al Queda attack)
In one contact note the
start of world war III is described.Russia invades Europe and civic
upheavals start in France and other countries.For me, it looked like
the entire story was written in a cold war mindset.When I looked
at the date when the prophecy was publicized it was in the 1980's,
before the fall of the Berlin wall and the communist block.Nowdays
that prophecy seems incorrect and of little value.Russia isn't going
to invade Europe nor are there any possible conflicts on the horizon.
In retrospect the entire prophecized chain of events seems just
inaccurate and false.
Originally posted by Gazrok
First off, we still need proof that Billy's predictions were published PRIOR to the time the events occurred. This seems to be a simple matter, but I have yet to see such proof.
Second, as I have stated, the actions of a president more than 20 years ago, have VERY LITTLE bearing on current world politics. To claim that Reagan set the stage for WWIII is an absolute mistruth of the highest order, and blatant denial of current world politics.
Third, anyone familiar with Diana and Charles' courtship would predict trouble for them. You didn't need a crystal ball or contact with aliens to see it coming. Almost every tabloid journalist made the same prediction.
Also, 8 YEARS is not getting near your end... It's almost a decade for Pete's sake!
Again, we still need to see that such prophecies were made public BEFORE the events ocurred. If you could direct me to such a publication, in print (for online can easily be manipulated), I would be happy to then check it out and rethink my opinion of Mr. Meier. I've searched for such, but have as of yet come up empty on this.
None of his models were, nor needed to be life sized. This is evident in many photos where the shadows on the craft first give the viewer the inkling that something isn't right. It's because such shadows are such that would be on a craft smaller than it appears in the photo. I've explained that it wouldn't take much, even with one arm, to affix a model to a piece of glass, and then angle as to not have any reflection on the glass.
Perhaps the BIGGEST problem with Billy's photos is that he NEVER submitted the negatives for testing, and often multi-generation reprints. This particular reason is the PRIME reason he CANNOT claim the photos passed any kind of scientific test. Without the negatives, photo tampering CANNOT be ruled out. It's a simple FACT. I'm not buying the one arm excuse. I've known quadraplegic painters who can paint masterpieces with the brush in their mouth! Often, handicapped people make up for such impairment in spades, with sheer determination. I have no doubt Billy is in that category.
Let me refer you to my first example.
�And it will be that the fanatics of Islam will rise up and cover the lands of Europe with war, all will shake and quiver� (applied to be proof of foreseeing the Spain Al Queda attack)
How vague can you get?
Amazing that prophecied which happened in the past (but supposedly predicted prior) are so accurate with names, times, dates, etc. yet anything to happen after today has NONE of this... How can you NOT be even a little skeptical???
BTW, attacks on the WTC have been plotted, and foiled, by terrorists since the early 80's. To suspect it as the first successful attack, is hardly an uneducated guess... It was always THE primary target of such an attack...has been for decades....
As for the alloys, I haven't seen anything where such finds are not producable on Earth, or even particularly remarkable.
Besides, if the aliens were willing to give him some to prove his story, wouldn't it be easier and more convincing to give up some kind of harmless technological device? Surely the alien equivalent of a pencil sharpener isn't going to blow up the world... A bit like giving a caveman a little LED calculator....
Well, WWIII is quickly approaching, so I suppose we'll see how false this scenario is soon enough. I think the likelihood of Russia invading Europe as the first step in WWIII, about as likely as Arafat joining Sharon at Temple, but hey, that's just me...
If you have these concerns, then why do you use his predictions to support them being vague
His books are time-stamped. I suppose, to really see if they are prior, you would have to find someone with his earlier books, and if you still suspicious, have them scientifically dated.
think we have to come to an agreement then. You will not discuss his predictions, until you have adequate corroborating evidence that they were made in advance of the events. We will talk later on this.
3. You will need to have it scientifically validated from a professional source and produce a testimony and a report.
The scientists that have analysed his photos, and with all due respect to you, are professionals, think his photographs are adequate evidence.
One reason Meier does not release the negatives, is because of one your biggest issues with him "Asket and Nara" which he claims were switched. If he is telling the truth, then it would be unwise of him to repeat the same.
That would be technology transfer, regardless.
Again, this is part of the prophecies of Henoch, which do not claim any starting or any order, there is a constellation of events occuring, before, during and after WWIII. If we are going into WWIII, then I don't think anyone is going to care how right Meier was, or indeed Titor was, we'll all be fending for each other, trying to survive.
� 1978, 1992:
In his book, Existing Life in the Universe, Meier stated that there are two small planetary bodies outside Pluto's orbit; he called them Trans-Pluto and Uni, and said scientists will discover them in the not-too-distant future.
Corroborated: July 3, 2001 and October 7, 2002, the BBC reported that scientists have discovered a new planet beyond Pluto.
� 150th Contact, October 10, 1981:
Meier discussed information concerning the 29 actual moons of Saturn, and the origins of moons from asteroids.
Corroborated: November 2000, scientists announced the discovery of 12 additional moons orbiting Saturn, bringing the "official" total to 28, just one shy of what Meier reported almost 20 years earlier; scientist corroborates the likelihood that moons originate from asteroids.
� 31st Contact, July 17, 1975:
Semjase informed Meier that Mt Chimborazo, Ecuador, is the highest mountain on Earth (above sea level), contrary to Meier's belief that it was Mt Everest.
Corroborated: June 1996 in Earth magazine, 21 years later.
So far, the ones we KNOW are for the future, are vague....
Hope you have better luck than I did on this.
Without the negatives, any claim of "scientific validation" is bogus. Negatives can show signs of tampering that prints do not show. Also, it does NOT take advanced tech to do this. When in photo in art, we made all kinds of manipulations in the darkroom, just by moving things around, etc. Double exposures on light backgrounds are incredibly easy.
Other professionals have likewise called foul. Why should either of us believe one over the other?
Easy enough to circumvent, provide negatives of already published photos.
So would an alloy proven to be extra-terrestrial. Regardless, why then didn't one of these scientists then publish a paper on it, collect their Nobel prize, etc.?
Yes, but apparently, events in the past were told to the minute, day, etc. If these truly were predictions of FUTURE events, what made those events less fluid? What made them more predictable? Right now, my best answer is the simple one...because they already happened when the prediction was made....
I beg to differ, negatives are not necessary for photographic analysis. When photographic evidence is required, there is not always the luxury of having the negatives too. Anyhow, as for as I am concerned, either his images are reproduced with the criteria specified, or you accept them as credible evidence.
Yes, but do we have the capability to reverse engineer it, further more, if we did, do we have access to the elements used in it's manufacture. However, instead had they provided Meier with an ET microchip composed of the same alloy, we may not have been able to reproduce the alloy, but we could have found out how it functions, and adapted it to our own materials. In the end, Meiers's alloy does not constitute technology transfer, material transfer maybe, but not technology.
They do not have an exact time, but a general time frame of 2006 is given, the events themselves are specific enough.
This was not a prediction, this was rather a forecast of a scenorio that is likely to manifest, if we do not change our ways. Quetzal did say, that there is a difference between predictions and prophecies. Predictions are events that will certainly happen, and prophecies are events that can happen. This is a prophecy.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Instead of sending us their energy, a simple public visit with a world leader would easily suffice.
Charlatains continue to hide behind this "Star Trek" Prime Directive nonsense... I fail to see how revealing their existance to one person isn't violating the same rules.
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree here... Asking someone to reproduce or validate photos scientifically, without providing the negatives, is akin to a doctor trying to diagnose a patient based on a photograph...
I'm amazed those at the Disclosure Project are doing so. I should add that I believe in the effort put forth by them, but I'll also state that they are too quick to accept evidence that seems good on the surface without delving deeper. This will end up biting them in the ass eventually, if they ever do actually get their day.
Again, where's the paper? Such a find would easily give this IBM patent-holding scientist (which doesn't exactly mean much) a lock on the Nobel Prize. So what's the hold up? The logical conclusion is easy. It obviously won't stand up to the scrutiny of fellow scientists, and he knows it, because it isn't remarkable at all.
Yep, Russia invading Europe... Guess we'll see, huh?
That's convenient. So what are then, some "predictions" for the future, vs, prophecies? Do THEY include dates, times, etc. like those of the past? I'd be willing to bet thats a resounding "no". And if that is the case, then your skeptic radar should be beeping like crazy....
Ask yourself, today, are we prepared to accept a superior race of people besides us? I think the Pleaidians, as a spiritually advanced culture, recognizes this, and will only disclose themselves when the time is right.
Strange that, actual professionals in JPL, and other scientists do not think so. Are you retracting your claim you can easily reproduce them? Alright, so you are not willing to accept them as evidence, even though you cannot reproduce them. Then it would be irrational of you to maintain they are hoaxes or such and such. As far as I am concerned, your argument against Meiers photographs stands nullified.
This is your presumption that they have not analysed his case properly. It has no weight in an objective investigation of Meiers case.
Marcel is a highly-esteemed scientist in IBM, holding some 32 patents. Do you have any idea what it would do to his credibility to support the contention that Billy Meier is being visisted by aliens? What exactly would he get a nobel prize for, for analysing a piece of metal? Providing testimony is one thing, but pushing for the existence of aliens who visit Meier, is another thing altogether.
You do realize Europe is becoming one superstate now? The entire EU superstate would share borders with Russia, causing much upset in the balance of power. I don't think Russia will be happy. We know, Russia and US are age-old enemies, in a potential conflict between US and Russia, who do you think EU will be on the side of? In a world war, with two big powers, right next to each other, and at odds, of course conflict can break out.
You cannot hold Meier accountable here, he is only the supposed messenger. Here is one reason, why I think exact dates cannot be given, because events are happening so fast, that our timeline is constantly changing. As I said, this is the culmination of events to date. Secondly, I think some information is just too sensitive for a responsible ET civilization to divulge. There can be a multitide of reasons. At the end of the day, it's not in yours, mine or even Meiers power, on what they tell him.
If we are about to destroy ourselves, then yes, I would think the time is right.....
However, scientifically they CANNOT be validated without the negatives. That is a FACT, and is incontrovertable.
Regardless, it will end up biting them in the ass... Meier isn't the only bad connection they've made, but it is the highest profile link that will eventually hurt their credibility.
I suppose hawking healing crystals makes him a super credible source? Or did you not check that link either? If there is a way to PROVE that the sample could not be made on Earth and could not have been made by man, then yes, I'd say there is a good chance for a Nobel here... That is the case claimed is it not? It'd have to be, to be proof of extraterrestrial origin....
Time will tell in 2 years I suppose....
The classic cop out. You have to see that? Can't blame him when he's wrong, but he'll take the credit when right... Blame it on the alien misinterpretation, hehe... We can't be trusted with the info, yadda yadda yadda.....
Please read through the ATS link to the other Billy thread....I think you'll see quite a bit. In the end, we may continue to have a difference of opinion on Billy, but I do appreciate the civil point and counterpoint...
And what do you think is happening right now? The Pleidians claim they are here for the very purpose of helping us, and Quetzal did say in the 215th contact, that the possibility of ET intervention may materialize.
We are not exactly destroying ourselves yet. When we are, then the time would be right for an ET civilization to intervene, and I am sure in terms of intergalactic law, it is permissable.
The Pleaidians have said, however, that it may take some 700 years before they engage us properly, as we are not mature enough.
Again, with all due respect to you Gazrok, but real scientists don't seem to share this opinion of yours. Another fact, the scientists that analysed Meiers photographs were not UFO investigators. Are you misrepresenting facts?
In an investigation involving photographic evidence, there is not always the luxury of havig access to negatives, thus they are proven in others manners. Scientifc analysis does not hinge on negatives, and mind you, the negatives are what produce the photographs anyway, any attempts at manipulation, would register. Have you even cared to read the photographic analysis document on Horns site?
Anyway, good luck in reproducing them, and it would be to my satisfaction, if it meets all criteria. How much time do you need to do this?
It's still an opinion, and based on prejudice against Meier, so I am going to exclude it from this debate.
Many scientists have spiritual, paranormal and metaphysical beliefs. Is it your right to judge someones because of their beliefs?
Crystals, actually do have healing properties, I know this myself, because I felt the surge of energy from them from a clear quartz crystal, and also felt the magnetic like pull between my palms, when handelling them, I was also able to create a bio-magnetic effect, and cause the crystal to slip of my hand, by sweeping my other palm over it. It was intense. Marcel is not the only one who claims they have healing properties. I am also aware there are scientific studies that affirm the metaphysical properties of crystals.
This kind of attack on credidibility is best suited to the intellectually dishonst and substance impoverished, Randi's and the like. I am surprised you would do the same, especially considering your beliefs in spirituality and extraterrestrials. I am sorry, but I think this is a form of hypocrisy. Please, be impartial in your investigation of Meier, do not let your prejudices come in the way, for they will only limit your intellects.
Suppose, theres a time bomb implanted inside you from the Zetan reptillians, that is to go off in exactly 2 years. I give you advance warning. You wait 2 years. Then you explode.
Yes, people can disagree, and do so in a civil manner, while respecting each other on what they agree on