Native American Confronts Protesters on Illegal Immigration , page 11

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:14 AM by 200Plus

reply to post by VariableConstant

How much more ironic is the decendant of immigrants yelling at decendants of immigrants for protesting against immigrants?

No human is native to the Americas.

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:20 AM by Stormdancer777

reply to post by Maslo

The man in the video is a living proof AGAINST unchecked immigration,if anything. Thats the logical conclusion.

Everyone has different opinions, my Sioux son in law is very anti illegal immigration, you should hear his view on the subject, he feels they are just as big of a problem, and encroaching on what was once his tribal lands.

He is as passionately anti black and white and Hispanic.

I do tell him it is time to let it go, I am European native American mixed, and let me tell you native Americans have a big issues with bloods verses breeds as well,

How are we going to differentiate ?

People asks me what race I am, black, white, Hispanic?

I went through the anger stages now I think we need to work together.

edit on 092828p://bWednesday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:24 AM by chrome413

reply to post by liverlad

There is no archaeological evidence Native Americans have been here for hundreds of thousands of years. None. In fact, they aren't even the original inhabitants of the continent. Don't just take my word for it, do a little research.

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:27 AM by luciddream

reply to post by chrome413

Okay, find the people that was here before the native Americans, so we can send them a memo to come kick out native Americans.

In about 500 yrs, it will be established the European settler are the original inhabitant of the America. If we still keep a record that is.

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:30 AM by Stormdancer777

New Genetic Links Found Between Native Americans And Northern Europeans
December 1, 2012

Northern European populations – including British, Scandinavians, French and some Eastern Europeans – descend from a mixture of two very different ancestral populations a new study finds, and one of these populations is related to Native Americans. The results of this study, published in the November issue of the Genetics Society of America’s journal GENETICS, help fill in the gaps in scientific understanding of both Native American and Northern European ancestry, while providing an explanation for some genetic similarities among what would otherwise seem to be very divergent groups.

Nick Patterson, of the Broad Institute, says, “There is a genetic link between the paleolithic population of Europe and modern Native Americans. The evidence is that the population that crossed the Bering Strait from Siberia into the Americas more than 15,000 years ago was likely related to the ancient population of Europe.”

The Bering Strait is a current day channel of water linking the Arctic Ocean and the Bering Sea. This channel separates the continents of Asian and North America by a margin of only 53 miles at its narrowest point. Scientists believe that some 20,000 to 25,000 years ago – during the late Pleistocene – massive continental glaciers formed in the northern hemisphere, locking up so much water that the world’s oceans were more than 300 feet lower than current day levels. This exposed an unglaciated tract known as the Bering Land Bridge, connecting Northeastern Siberia with Alaska, and allowing for migrations of animals and hominins from Asia to North America. Current theories hold that this land bridge was open until as recently as 11,000 years ago.

Patterson and his colleagues, including Harvard Medical School Professor of Genetics David Reich, studied DNA diversity, finding that one of these ancestral populations was the first farming population of Europe. The DNA of this group lives on today in relatively unmixed form in Sardinians and the people of the Basque Country. It is also present in at least the Druze population of the Middle East.
www.redorbit.com...
The second ancestral population is likely to have been the hunter-gathering population of Europe, which today appears to have its closest affinity to people in far Northeastern Siberia and Native Americans. When they met, these two populations were very different.

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:33 AM by pyramid head

reply to post by BrandonD

Thats a stupid comment, so if illegal immigration is an issue that matters to you, your racists? Clearly you don't live near a border state and do not have to deal with the gangs. You do realize that in the past few years more mexicans have been murdered in mexico by gangs than all the casualties of the vietnam war, right? But that's okay because once they cross the border illegally they stop, and are good law abiding citizens.

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:39 AM by undo

reply to post by liverlad

okay so when is a person considered indigenous? for example, you know that at one time, the whole globe was called pangaea? and pangaea was one huge land mass with shallow seas. (personally, i think native americans were ancient egyptians at one point. just a llttle hunch i have after researching ancient cultures). and that there's evidence of the continents interlocking. like africa and south america. and that there's evidence of black and chinese ancient civs in south america (olmecs)

YouTube Link

and evidence of whites in north america such as the vikings and kennewick, so i'm thinking we are all pangaeans and then continental drift happened, but that's a different story. i dunno how far back all this goes, i just think it's kinda important that since we're the descendants of our ancestors, that we show them better by getting along with each other FOR REAL. when's it stop otherwise? if you think removing white people from the planet will solve it, you are in for a shock.

edit on 6-2-2013 by undo because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:42 AM by liverlad

Originally posted by chrome413
reply to post by liverlad

There is no archaeological evidence Native Americans have been here for hundreds of thousands of years. None. In fact, they aren't even the original inhabitants of the continent. Don't just take my word for it, do a little research.

Well some of them have been around long enough to adapt to their enviroment, take the Eskimos of North America for example,

"Eskimos have evolved to endure the cold; thicker blood, darker skin pigment to absorbs heat, and their bodies retain more body fat on their torsos to protect vital organs (whereas most North Americans store fat around our waists and butts).....their bodies are built differently. They have been living in the cold longer so their bodies have become shorter and stockier so that they retain more heat. Also, they have developed other ways to stay warm through their warm cloths and housing.These are not just Physical changes....they have anatomically,physiologically evolved to sustain Cold"

How long do you think it took for them to adapt to Alaska like that? A few thousand years?

edit on 6-2-2013 by liverlad because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 09:50 AM by luciddream

reply to post by _R4t_

*/clap*.... i actually learned a lot... things books didn't teach.

Lot of cultures respect their elders.., Retirement home is looked down in my family as well.