All this news about boy scouts and sexual preference I just heard about because of the Presidents comments as reported in
before the most watched
reported by forbes
some questions for me.
Why is all of a sudden the sexual preference of a person under age 11 up for discussion?
What is the actual accepted age of being considered aware of your sexuality?
Would the subject have evolved so recently the same way if the group had been the girl scouts?
When the government says it is legal to be sexual under age 11 but you have to be 13 to go see certain movies, or buy a regulated song or album, 14 to
have a job, 16 to drive a car, 18 to purchase a gun, or go see even rarer films, or vote, or die for your country in the military, or get a credit
card, or a bank account, or rent a car, or a hotel room, or be subject to the law in general as a now Non Minor, 21 to buy types of harmful and
addictive regulated substances like alcohol, or tobacco, but there is no legal age limit on owing taxes, even a fetus with a trust fund upon
conception could be theoretically subject to income tax, is there something wrong?
What is the accepted definition of To Be Sexual then, and how might that definition unfold, being that sex involves actions of many kind, physical,
oral etc. , as doesn't it then violate laws that exist of free thinking greater than 17 year old people to even speculate, that this means it is
legal for someone under the age of 11 to be experiencing the insertion or ingestion of bodily fluids of other people their age as well as even their
same gender, but at the same time it's not legal to ingest something like wine, even with the consent of that child's parents?
I am not even sure why I am disturbed by this news, but I am.
So what frightens me more, that the President needs to rule on such sensitive topics, or that at the same time there are so many more pressing topics
that need rule upon, and if not undertaken or accomplished, soon and eventually nobodies preference on any topic of any scale at any age will matter,
or potentially even exist.
I do not liked to be scared.
Pregnancies now passed the stage where apparent informality in the fetus can be detected, and rejected, for even something like Downs Syndrome, so I
as the title of this thread states, rulings have been made on sexual preference of grown men, now children, will soon fetus's will be judged on their
sexually genetic make up, and be rejected? Then a whole new quantum debate will ensue.