It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Quite true...but then there is this as well from the current Administration.
www.washingtontimes.com...
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.
Could she have a point....maybe, There are nutjobs in every segment of society, but I still find it disturbing as well.edit on 4-2-2013 by TDawgRex because: I guess it's time to hit the hay.
Originally posted by seabag
The question TPTB must consider is "How do you think active duty military members will feel when they see veterans being harassed and targeted, knowing that they too will be veterans one day?"
Originally posted by Daedalus
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This doesn't make sense. If they were going to target vets, why would they let vets keep their military style assault weapons?
I think this is paranoia taken to an extreme. And vets aren't some mindless bunch of unthinking morons. They don't think with one mind, just as any other group. People have different opinions on these things, regardless whether they were in the military or not.
they're starting to disarm them already...i've read reports of vets being involuntarily institutionalized, released, and then denied access to firearms. it's a massive scam...
this is not paranoia taken to an extreme...this is the writing on the wall being highlighted, for all to see...unfortunately, it seems the rose tint through which you see the world around you has kept from seeing all but the most important things...
stay oblivious, my friend....they'll get you too, eventually..
Originally posted by Daedalus
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Quite true...but then there is this as well from the current Administration.
www.washingtontimes.com...
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.
Could she have a point....maybe, There are nutjobs in every segment of society, but I still find it disturbing as well.edit on 4-2-2013 by TDawgRex because: I guess it's time to hit the hay.
lol, this is literally "old news"
DHS has a lot of types of people on that list....gun owners, libertarians, returning vets, ron paul supporters, conspiracy theorists (smile for echelon and Carnivore, everybody..)
and that's just to name a few...
Originally posted by nenothtu
I think they've already gotten to her. Did you notice that she included the stock phrase "military style assault weapons"? That's inidicative of having taken a huge draught of the kool aid.
They don't "let them keep" anything at all, much less assault weapons. If a vet gets and assault weapon, he's got to get it on his own, pay for it on his own, and register it as a class III weapon on his own, just like everyone else. "They" aren't "letting them keep" any damned thing at all beyond their DD-214 and a pretty uniform to hang in the closet with a bunch of cute ribbons and shiny things on it.
Furthermore, ALL "assault weapons" are "military style". That's who invented them. There is no need or sense in using the redundant phraesology - other than as a stock phrase used as a scare tactic.
Those cute little black-rifle AR-15's we hear so much about are "military style", but ARE NOT "assault weapons". Assault weapons are, by definition, selective fire. AR-15's are not. They LOOK like an M-16, but they ARE NOT one.
That kool aid may taste good, but I don't want any of it.
edit on 2013/2/5 by nenothtu because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by projectvxn
probably because in general the armed forces of this country have become mercanaries, no respect for people who kill for money.
same thing terrorists do.
there are no just wars.
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by projectvxn
probably because in general the armed forces of this country have become mercanaries, no respect for people who kill for money.
same thing terrorists do.
there are no just wars.
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by projectvxn
probably because in general the armed forces of this country have become mercanaries, no respect for people who kill for money.
same thing terrorists do.
there are no just wars.
Oh yeah. Such a lucrative pursuit too. 20,000 bucks a year is definitely in par with what real mercenaries make for sure.
Jesus do you people listen to yourselves?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Sounds to me like they've got a guilty conscience, thinking that the mercenaries are going to be in it for a bit of payback. They're not - most of them, anyhow. Mercenaries are not "super soldiers", they're mostly just vets who have had enough.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Originally posted by nenothtu
Sounds to me like they've got a guilty conscience, thinking that the mercenaries are going to be in it for a bit of payback. They're not - most of them, anyhow. Mercenaries are not "super soldiers", they're mostly just vets who have had enough.
I would say that most merc's are in it for the money. Nothing more and nothing less. The good ones (trained) get paid big bucks. The amateurs get paid very little. They are cannon fodder, but they have their uses too.
They aren’t Union, nor do they get medical benefits. They are paid well to take care of those things on their own.
edit on 6-2-2013 by TDawgRex because: Gotta get beer