It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unbelievably, they pretty much 'fell' on the grave straight away - in a section of the carpark marked with R ( this painted on one of the parking spaces ).
Originally posted by Rising Against
If there is something in this, why on earth did it take until now for it to be confirmed? I'd be curious to know when the carpark was built exactly as well, and by who (particularly when the R was marked). But anyway, fascinating subject, and not one I know a great deal about admittedly, but I really enjoyed watching.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by stumason
I agree, more or less.
We should recognise though there is a chance it isn't him at all. As mitochondrial DNA is such a poor guide for determining identity, it does make me wonder why they placed so much emphasis on that part of the identification.
Either way, get him back to York for burial. We will accept him, even if it isn't really him!
Originally posted by erwalker
reply to post by HelenConway
So how many generations have to pass before a person is no longer considered to be of his ancestors' nationality?
Hell, you could say that all the kings and queens from William the Conquerer to at least James II were Norman rather than English based on the fact that they all are descended from William patrilinearly or matrilinearly.
Originally posted by Rising Against
reply to post by ironorchid
Unbelievably, they pretty much 'fell' on the grave straight away - in a section of the carpark marked with R ( this painted on one of the parking spaces ).
If there is something in this, why on earth did it take until now for it to be confirmed? I'd be curious to know when the carpark was built exactly as well, and by who (particularly when the R was marked). But anyway, fascinating subject, and not one I know a great deal about admittedly, but I really enjoyed watching.edit on 5-2-2013 by Rising Against because: (no reason given)