New World Order Exposed by Australian Politician in Parliament., page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 91 times


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 07:35 AM by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by nOraKat
Originally posted by NonchalantUnder Agenda 21 all central government and local authority signatories are required to conform strictly to a common prescribed standard and hence this is just communism resurrected in a new guise.


Wow, you guys are confusing - so the globalist secret government wants to resurrect communism? I thought they were fighting for capitalism..

So I think the big question is whether Agenda 21 genuinely has good intentions or is being used as a tool to result in the detriment of our society. I am not sure how things like environmental concerns can be used as a tool for a globalist agenda.

I am not sure if I am even opposed to a globalist agenda. It depends on how it will be run. If it is run well for the well being of our Earth and it's beings, then I am not against it.


Yeah they can smell a rat but they can't label it properly. In the USA we have been conditioned through the decades to abhor any form of communism or socialism. Millions have died in vain with manufactered propaganda.

I do not support communism but I do support socialism, something like facism. The "only problem" but an unbelievably big one, is that extremely wealthy and also wicked individuals have infiltrated the UN and other national and international organisations. They are serpent worshipers aka satanists.

You on the otherhand dish everyone who believes any conspiracy theory and are gullible enough to think these organisations are pure, honest and good-intentioned. They are not!


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 08:54 AM by chrome413
reply to post by Darkphoenix77



I don't see how you could possibly read what I wrote and come to your conclusion. I think you may not even be reading them. Being blinded by your own preconceived notions. Open your mind and Deny Ignorance.



reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 01:25 PM by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by chrome413
reply to
post by Darkphoenix77



I don't see how you could possibly read what I wrote and come to your conclusion. I think you may not even be reading them. Being blinded by your own preconceived notions. Open your mind and Deny Ignorance.




I read what you wrote I just think it is complete BS.

You want my solution to overpopulation? Put money into space exploration, we could also develop parts of the world that are underdeveloped and/or untouched. If the population becomes too large I have no fear that mother nature will take care of the problem for us.

Placing a forced limit on human reproduction is immoral and unfeasible. I think anyone that desires control over others should be dragged into the street and beat senseless personally. It is not your place nor mine nor anyone elses to impose limits. That is where common sense should come into play, people who try and enforce a mandate have none and people that become baby making factories having a dozen kids they can't care for have none either. But that is their problem......not mine.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 04:03 PM by chrome413
reply to post by Darkphoenix77



Again, nowhere, I repeat- Nowhere, do I see anyone writing anything about "forced" limits on births. The couple suggestions I threw out off the top of my head were completely voluntary programs. I don't personally think forced limits are anyone's right either, but again, I never suggested that.

You know, I'm done. There is obviously a connection not being made somewhere and it's completely pointless to further this discussion. The last word is yours.


reply posted on 6-2-2013 @ 07:04 PM by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by chrome413
reply to
post by Darkphoenix77



Again, nowhere, I repeat- Nowhere, do I see anyone writing anything about "forced" limits on births. The couple suggestions I threw out off the top of my head were completely voluntary programs. I don't personally think forced limits are anyone's right either, but again, I never suggested that.

You know, I'm done. There is obviously a connection not being made somewhere and it's completely pointless to further this discussion. The last word is yours.


Look, I am not trying to be a jerk, I just honestly don't see your point. If they are "voluntary" than how could they possibly accomplish anything? The people that don't want to have kids or only a certain amount are already doing so of thier own free will.


reply posted on 7-2-2013 @ 11:09 AM by chrome413
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by chrome413
reply to
post by Darkphoenix77




Look, I am not trying to be a jerk, I just honestly don't see your point. If they are "voluntary" than how could they possibly accomplish anything? The people that don't want to have kids or only a certain amount are already doing so of thier own free will.




I don't want to come across as a jerk either. I'm sorry for anything negative I implied earlier.

I do think though that over population is a problem. And I think reducing the world's population is something that could be achieved over several generations. And I don't mean some drastic 75% reduction at all. Maybe stagnant population growth would be a better term for me to use than population reduction.

It's a proven fact that the more education women have, the fewer children the have. I'd like to see the "underdeveloped world" better educated. Also, there is the option of making birth control more readily available to people. In fact, I read an article on yahoo the other day about a male birth control shot that makes sperm immobile and lasts for like 6 months or something. I think if people had options then they may choose to have fewer children. Maybe even special tax breaks for people who choose to have only one child, or even two, because two would result in 0 net population growth.

I don't like or support any idea similar to China's One Child policy. Or anything involving genocide or any population control forced on anyone. I just think it's something that could be accomplished voluntarily if approached properly.

I know I said I was done, but I thought I should restate my position more rationally without the curtness. If we disagree, that's cool.
edit on 7-2-2013 by chrome413 because: i have no idea why my reply is all in the quote thing. still trying to figure out ats.



reply posted on 7-2-2013 @ 12:45 PM by THEBEARDEDGOAT
reply to post by omega man



Well there u have it! Ladies and gentleman from ATS, the Ron Paul movement has blasted off. If u are truly worth your salt u will post this video and every other video that is informing yet easy to comprehend(9th grade level) and tell your loved ones that its ok to admit ignorance of things like political corruption on a global scale or even common misconceptions. its ok to be ignorant but its NOT ok to stay ignorant. im sure ats gets alot of this but c'mon guys! help your fellow humans now more than ever. TEAM HUMAN RACE!!!


reply posted on 7-2-2013 @ 02:27 PM by Darkphoenix77


I don't want to come across as a jerk either. I'm sorry for anything negative I implied earlier.

I do think though that over population is a problem. And I think reducing the world's population is something that could be achieved over several generations. And I don't mean some drastic 75% reduction at all. Maybe stagnant population growth would be a better term for me to use than population reduction.

It's a proven fact that the more education women have, the fewer children the have. I'd like to see the "underdeveloped world" better educated. Also, there is the option of making birth control more readily available to people. In fact, I read an article on yahoo the other day about a male birth control shot that makes sperm immobile and lasts for like 6 months or something. I think if people had options then they may choose to have fewer children. Maybe even special tax breaks for people who choose to have only one child, or even two, because two would result in 0 net population growth.

I don't like or support any idea similar to China's One Child policy. Or anything involving genocide or any population control forced on anyone. I just think it's something that could be accomplished voluntarily if approached properly.

I know I said I was done, but I thought I should restate my position more rationally without the curtness. If we disagree, that's cool.
edit on 7-2-2013 by chrome413 because: i have no idea why my reply is all in the quote thing. still trying to figure out ats.



In a perfect situation what you are proposing is an acceptable alternative to what we have now (tax breaks, increased birth control availability, and education). My resistance to the idea comes from the fact that I would not trust the people in charge to be reasonable with implementation of any population control policy. Something like this could be too easily abused in my opinion.

Education is the best alternative I think, people should learn that one does not need to have 15 children to ensure the bloodline anymore, and having more than 4 is very detrimental to the environment when multiple people decide to have lots of children. I am against anything that is forced or permanent. Theoretically worst case scenario in the event of a world disaster, we may at some point wish to be able to procreate to higher levels and if that is taken away we would in effect be causing our own extinction as a species.

I just don't trust the people in charge to hold my jockstrap let alone regulate who is and isn't worthy of having children. Too many people of financial means already consider themselves superior to those of financial hardship, and I would not them anywhere near any worldwide population control policy.


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 10:04 AM by Watcher26
reply to post by nOraKat



It's clear that global warming is happening - but it may just be part of the natural cycle of things. The earth has a way of restoring balance.
edit on 8/2/13 by Watcher26 because: typo...



reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 10:43 AM by alienDNA
reply to post by Kryties



you clearly have a reading disabilty.
I said they should do this because of the poverty. OR the africans should stop making kids altogether, and it will happen naturally.

Or, you think its ok to give birth to a baby - put a child into this world - and then let it starve to death?
This to me is human cruelty and a shameful and utter waste of soul carnations.

YOU are what is wrong with this world, not me. Im simply a very realistic person, you seem to live in dreamland


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 05:35 PM by fireyaguns
Originally posted by yourignoranceisbliss
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to
post by Murgatroid



Indeed, I bury my head in the sand by visiting ATS.



Indeed, why do you come to ATS if you dislike everything here?

Find a better job perhaps? Spending all day on this website, looking for threads to troll, you must be a very sad and lonely person. Hope you're being paid well at least!
.



Your so right. Couldn't find a kind way of saying this, we'll done.

Watched the vid, how long till she is taken out?
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Amazing Bloodline - Mitt Romney Is Related To Obama & Bush
  Posted 2 days ago with 40 member flags
I have come to break the news to you..
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
No Longer To Serve and Protect
  Posted 17 days ago with 12 member flags
I beheld Satan falling as Baraq “O” Bamah
  Posted 13 days ago with 11 member flags
Chinese global government aspirations
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
The Power Behind the New World Order
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags