It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Originally posted by SBMcG
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by SBMcG
Its so sad some of you will look for absolutely any reason possible (even if there isnt one there) to slam this president, when there are so many real reasons to slam the government!
I understand that Obama supporters are going to respond this way.
sometimes a voice of reason is needed.
Its a photo of him shooting clay pigeons, look at the BS you've managed to produce?
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by SBMcG
Angle of shotgun
As has been pointed out, he's an amateur, but that's beside the point. You weren't there. you don't know where the skeet was or anything like that. This too is beside the point...What does it matter what the angle is? Did they photoshop it to be at the wrong angle? Why?
Wouldn't it make more sense, if they were photoshopping things like that, to make the angle higher so it looks like he knows what he's doing?
lack of recoil
And again, a single shot won't show recoil. especially at the shutter speed it was taken at.
stance
Refer to the first point...Wouldn't it make more sense, if they were photoshopping things like that, to make his stance better so it looks like he knows what he's doing?
and that's not even taking into account any technical issues (Photoshop) of the photo itself.
Well why not point out the specific flaws in the high resolution image for us then?
Saying "blah blah is wrong" doesn't help anyone...
edit on 3/2/13 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
far out i was actually being sarcastic!
you mob actually believe this has been Photoshopped so it looks like he's shooting skeet?
question, why wouldn't he just do a staged 'skeet' shoot, and use that photo? instead of Photoshop something else which leaves proof?
you know, the white house media room probably uses MAC and Photoshop as the norm. you want them to use MS Paint for photos?
some of you are unfrikkenbelievable!
edit on 3-2-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by okiecowboy
reply to post by anton74
explain to me how porting works with smoke only coming out of one side?
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by SBMcG
please answer my question
question, why wouldn't he just do a staged 'skeet' shoot, and use that photo? instead of Photoshop something else which leaves proof?
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by SBMcG
What excuses?
You're the one making things up.
According to you this isn't Obama skeet shooting because the angle is wrong, his stance is wrong and there's no recoil.
And in fact, after looking at the original, full sized image. there is actually a small amount of motion blur, suggesting recoil.
So even with the fast shutter speed, recoil is present.
My bad for saying there wasn't any.
Originally posted by twitchy
Aren't images like this public domain when they are released?
I was always under the impression that things like Nasa Photos and the like belonged to the public, technically, we paid the damned photographer. If it's public domain, it's open game.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by SBMcG
Sorry, which question was that ?
Could it be your clutching at straws? using your hatred for President Obama to muddy your understanding?
1. He's an amateur shooter, so his stance is probably going to be what ever felt right
2. The angel of the gun means nothing, perhaps its a low target? maybe he missed, by a long way? maybe he's shooting at a target not something flying up? maybe its a Long long long way away and the angle justifies the low angel of the barrel?
3. Maybe he's shooting at nothing and just shooting a practice shot into the empty bush?
so many maybe's and yet so many of you are so sure its Photoshopped for some vicious reason!
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
far out i was actually being sarcastic!
you mob actually believe this has been Photoshopped so it looks like he's shooting skeet?
question, why wouldn't he just do a staged 'skeet' shoot, and use that photo? instead of Photoshop something else which leaves proof?
you know, the white house media room probably uses MAC and Photoshop as the norm. you want them to use MS Paint for photos?
some of you are unfrikkenbelievable!
edit on 3-2-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SBMcG
reply to post by RoScoLaz
Hehehehe! Well, you have clearly ignored the White House's plea not to alter the original photo.