Annual Boom-Symposium 2013 at Altus AFB, OK, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:01 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by boomer135



I personally think they should have both. Cameras and 3D virtual reality goggles fail. What happens if they fail right when a receiver in desperate need of fuel is coming into contact with the boom? They should always have some kind of back up system. Put a pod in, and if you don't use it, great, but if you do need it, you have it.


reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:02 PM by boomer135
reply to post by Wrabbit2000



Im checking on the public thing right now. As far as I know, while the simulator is in Altus, the public can go see it. But dont quote me on that.


And as for easier, I doubt it. There's nothing easier than preforming air refueling in the boom pod. It's like playing a video game without the monitor....wait a minute

Now it will be playing a video game with hundreds of millions of dollars in tax payers money.


reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:04 PM by boomer135
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to
post by boomer135



I personally think they should have both. Cameras and 3D virtual reality goggles fail. What happens if they fail right when a receiver in desperate need of fuel is coming into contact with the boom? They should always have some kind of back up system. Put a pod in, and if you don't use it, great, but if you do need it, you have it.


Quote me if I'm wrong, but i believe that the whole 3D thing came from the original plan of the Air Force leasing jets from Boeing instead of buying them outright. No boom pod means no modification when it came time to give the jets back. But I agree 100%. At least as a backup. However, from what I hear, there's no way for all the cameras to fail. One set has it's own battery supply supposedly. Not sure how the final product will work though.


reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:07 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by boomer135



Yeah, that's what I heard too.

No way for them to fail, I've heard that before. "Fighters don't need guns anymore, they have missiles." It ranks right up there with that one, and a few other choice ones I've heard through the years. I'll believe it when they can prove beyond any doubt that the cameras will work under any circumstance, and won't fail no matter what you do to them.

One of my personal favorites, was an F-15 pilot on their second attempt after an air abort. He announced he was "going today even if I lose an engine on take off." Needless to say, V1, he does, he aborts. Airplane spent two months getting repaired for a one time flight to the depot.
edit on 2/3/2013 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
edit on 2/3/2013 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:10 PM by boomer135
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to
post by boomer135



Yeah, that's what I heard too.

No way for them to fail, I've heard that before. "Fighters don't need guns anymore, they have missiles." It ranks right up there with that one, and a few other choice ones I've heard through the years. I'll believe it when they can prove beyond any doubt that the cameras will work under any circumstance, and won't fail no matter what you do to them.


Yeah that will never happen. Just like all the lights in the back will always work


reply posted on 3-2-2013 @ 01:16 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by boomer135



Oh, and don't forget, "This new electronic fuel monitoring system we're installing will work great, and make it much easier for you to monitor your fuel levels!" Right before it had something like an 80% failure rate.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Avro Arrow resurfacing?
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Nasa:Silent and Efficient Supersonic Bi-Directional Flying Wing
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Can anyone shed any light on what this aircraft may be doing?
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Impressive Climb Rate of The F-14A+ and F-14D
  Posted 18 days ago with 1 member flags
ufo???
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags