reply to post by Harte
Well I don't admire this debate one bit, I will humor you once more.
The Popol Vuh didn't exist before the Spanish Conquest.
Regardless, the information I am refering to was around long before it was.
Lord, you'd think that people would take at least the tiniest peek at what is known about their own sources!
Like I said, I've no interest in reading it.
Where did I try to tell you anything concerning "what this thread is about?"
You didn't. What your refering to is:
No I did not they did not interest me nor was this thread actually about the popol voh.
You need to understand your closing in on one little piece of an enormous wealth of information for some reason I don't ever care to know.
I called you out on a falsehood that you posted as if it were true. That's all.
Again... Thread title "Lost History" what do you not get about that? Prove it true or false and I'll admit there is a god.
Regarding your claim about a "rewritten" version of the Popol Vuh, that's is perfectly ridiculous since nobody could even read Mayan until Ronald
Reagan was president.
Would you like some cheese with that whine? Listen to you "it is ridiculous"
Here is my impression of you:
"He is saying something that is not what I believe. Help somebody stop this madman!"
haha too bad your rights are constantly infringed upon EH neighbour!
The Popol Vuh was created after the Spanish conquest. If you want to believe in some previous imaginary version, fine. People do believe ignorant
things, after all, and there's no stopping the ignorant from doing so.
You must be a politician.
Reason 1-You believe what they say.
Reason 2-Your inability to comprehend something other than your own pov regardless of all the information provided saying otherwise, even if some
little tidbit of information has cause for concern of being wrong. (In my mind it is probably all wrong anyways.)
On the other hand, you have had the opportunity to learn a couple of things about the real Popol Vuh in this thread, thanks to me. You appear not to
be curious enough about your own source to see this, however, and insist on some previous unknown version of the Popol Vuh, merely to ensure that
Crystal links is correct.
Something we both believe to some degree in respect to Crystallinks, learning something new? No, you have done nothing but waste my time with
absurdities while most others liked my thread. I am not so judgmental to jump to conclusions of something I know nothing about unlike yourself. It
helped support my theory, I never claimed it to be true, it was for interpretation of lost history and how rampant hidden facts are plastered around
the internet saying otherwise to so called "real history."
I'm here to tell you quit acting like you wrote the damn thing, I believe Crystallinks alot more than anything that comes out you or what an American
president has to say, not that you what you say is not believed by me, I can see your point, but I believe the opposite much more than a so called
real interpretation. Your nit picking corrections are non relevant to the meaning of this thread. It is not called "Lost History According To You
And Some Book I Used Very Few Words From."
Lord this many replies over it and you still don't understand I don't give a dam about it. You almost make me want to read the dam thing. It does
not matter either way. I merely present the facts plastered over the net. Kudos to you though for trying to press upon false information in place of
other false information(which I remind you has much more in common with truth than the "real version ever would."
edit on 16-2-2013 by beautyofperil because: (no reason given)