It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by 2manyquestions
Not only that, but you'd think they'd at least have puffy eyes and appear sleep deprived, but they all look like they had a good night's sleep.
Or at least not swaggering, chuckling and for some reason asking their handlers if they should just read from the card.
Their handlers? Where do you guys come up with this garbage?
"nobody has puffy eyes or a sleep deprived appearance"
Originally posted by Afterthought
I'm also considering the fact that his mother was killed by someone else who kidnapped Adam, then drove to the school, shot the kids, then killed Adam.
Originally posted by Laxpla
reply to post by Afterthought
Jeeze what else do you want me to do, do you want me to hold your hand when you go to the bathroom too
Link
If you're confused that was a person crying for the victim.
Here is another image of the parents of the children (I'm trying to get 4MP pictures) so you don't complain like a little girl and act dumb and say you can't see tears and puffy eyes.
graphics8.nytimes.com...
Now I've fulfilled what you requested, answer my post from previous. Thanks.
Edit: More specially, what you believed happen.
edit on 6-2-2013 by Laxpla because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Laxpla
Thanks for posting the link, but please refrain from being a bully.
I see that the article is from a Jewish site. It seems as though it's propaganda to me. What does it matter if the girl was Jewish?
Maybe this is to deflect the rumors that the Greenberg family was involved in this?
If so, they did a great job because that's the first parent I've seen that looks to be sincerely racked with grief.
Originally posted by Daedalus
but now that you're awake, get awake..pay attention.
Originally posted by theillusion
How are "the people" going to win the battle in court, when the court system serves the very people that write the legislation? The battle we face, will not be won in court. It can't be won in court. Think about it??? George Bush's presidency was won in the court system. Who did it favor, "the people" or "the system"?
Originally posted by torsion
Ha, ha! You conspiracy theorists are so tiresome with your claims that people aren't "awake" if they don't agree with you!
Try separating reality from fantasy. Stop dreaming and start thinking! Common sense is your friend... really. (Yawn)
Originally posted by Daedalus
Originally posted by torsion
Ha, ha! You conspiracy theorists are so tiresome with your claims that people aren't "awake" if they don't agree with you!
Try separating reality from fantasy. Stop dreaming and start thinking! Common sense is your friend... really. (Yawn)
wow, way to take what i said out of context...it takes a real genius to misquote someone, and then ridicule the person you misquoted for things they never said...
For the benefit of the of the people, here's what i actually said www.abovetopsecret.com...
and perhaps you can, instead of "putting words in my mouth" so to speak, actually address the post i made, not the post you imply i made, and actually explain to me what part of what i said is fantasy..
i'll be waiting..
Originally posted by torsion
Hi Daedalus,
Your earlier post that I responded to implied that people are not "awake" or not paying attention if they have an opinion contrary to yours. Telling people to "wake up" is a meaningless, hackneyed cliché. You weren't misquoted in any way nor were any words put in your mouth. You did say - "but now that you're awake, get awake..pay attention."
The fantasy part applies to the idea that you imagine people are not paying attention or are not awake if they interpret an event differently to you. Your post would have been a fine rebuttal point had you not appended it with "but now that you're awake, get awake..pay attention."
I take it you don't agree that the NRA and Scientology have exploited the deaths of the school kids?
cheers
Originally posted by Daedalus
I was not implying you were not awake, because your opinion differs from mine, i was telling you are not awake, because you are clearly not paying attention if you think the NRA and Scientology are the "only ones" trying to take advantage of the situation.
I am not aware of scientology doing anything to try to "take advantage" of the shooting, if you have anything about that, i'd love to see it...those crazy bastards make me laugh..
The NRA wants armed guards in school to protect the kids,
by saying that the NRA and cult of scientology are "the only ones trying to exploit the situation" it's fairly obvious, even to the casual observer, that you are just not paying attention.....last time i checked, using dead children to push a political agenda, most definitely counted as exploitation.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Laxpla
Thanks for posting the link, but please refrain from being a bully.
I see that the article is from a Jewish site. It seems as though it's propaganda to me. What does it matter if the girl was Jewish?
Maybe this is to deflect the rumors that the Greenberg family was involved in this?
If so, they did a great job because that's the first parent I've seen that looks to be sincerely racked with grief.
Edit to Add: Sorry I forgot the second part of your post after reading the article, so I'll do that now.
I think that Newtown was a place where they sent people for the witness protection program and approached some of them to assist in a government operation. Some residents were told, while others were not.
I also haven't ruled out that Lanza was an MK victim.
I'm also considering the fact that his mother was killed by someone else who kidnapped Adam, then drove to the school, shot the kids, then killed Adam.
I'm just not buying the official story. There is certainly more to this event than meets the eye.edit on 6-2-2013 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Orkojoker
Yeah, I also loved how I reasonably suggested that SOME of the parents would be emotional and I get attacked for even suggesting that, but the retort suggested that they are ALL able to hide their emotions.
Where is the reality in this? How could they ALL be able to contain their emotions and conduct interviews without even needing a tissue? I have yet to see a tissue in ONE interview. If someone can show me an interview with a tissue, please bring it forward. Thanks in advance as I'm very interested in viewing this.