The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by antoinemarionette
What I don't understand from all you "rock" and "pareidolia" people is why you haven't mentioned anything about the feet.
Because I cannot really see any feet in the original photo, as it's too small.
Resizing photos (with resampling) always creates new data that wasn't there in the original, what we look at is the result of the resampling algorithm.
As the resampling is applied to a JPEG compressed image, that already has their own artefacts present, not even the original can be considered as "clean" when we are looking at features close to the 8x8 size of the JPEG blocks.
I can not conceive of a rock with identical tiny reptilian feet that have teeny-tiny toes attached to it!!!
You can see the toes?
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.






