It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
You commend a loss of freedom. Fair enough.
I have lost the freedom to try to blow people up?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Why did the FBI go through all of this, when they could have just as easily held him based on the patriot act?
The Patriot Act provides for the arrest and detention of terrorists. It doesn't provide for their conviction.
Let's face it. Someone who contacts recruiters for Al Qaeda and then tries to blow up shoppers is clearly a terrorist.
Is he not?
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Very true, but does that justify the means? Are we ok with allowing our law enforcement to create crimes so as to get people off of the streets?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
It wasnt shoppers. Thanks for showing that you havent read about the case though.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Very true, but does that justify the means? Are we ok with allowing our law enforcement to create crimes so as to get people off of the streets?
If it's going to save lives, I have to say yes. It's kind of like that reporter on Night Line who sets pedophiles up using the internet. The true pedophile will take the next step and take the bait. People that don't entertain those thoughts won't even go to those sites. You get what you deserve.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Why did the FBI go through all of this, when they could have just as easily held him based on the patriot act?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Malcher
This is actually very common. Just watch ID television and plenty of shows where, usually a spouse, wants to hire a hit man and somehow law enforcement gets hold of it and poses as the hit man. That is only one example, there are others that are very similar.
Thats hardly the same thing, though. In those cases, the wife commits the crime just by hiring a hitman. In this case, the FBI came to him, before he committed any crime.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
So let me ask you, if you have a thought about robbing a bank, does that mean you'd be okay with it if the FBI came in, gave you the information and means that you needed, offered you money to do it, and then arrested you when you moved forward?
Originally posted by Malcher
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Malcher
This is actually very common. Just watch ID television and plenty of shows where, usually a spouse, wants to hire a hit man and somehow law enforcement gets hold of it and poses as the hit man. That is only one example, there are others that are very similar.
Thats hardly the same thing, though. In those cases, the wife commits the crime just by hiring a hitman. In this case, the FBI came to him, before he committed any crime.
She DID NOT hire a hit man, she thought she did. Cases like this are common and it happens often enough. I cant see why you dont understand the similarities though.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
So let me ask you, if you have a thought about robbing a bank, does that mean you'd be okay with it if the FBI came in, gave you the information and means that you needed, offered you money to do it, and then arrested you when you moved forward?
When you moved forward...
In other words when you planted the bomb.
reply to post by captaintyinknots
So let me ask you, if you have a thought about robbing a bank, does that mean you'd be okay with it if the FBI came in, gave you the information and means that you needed, offered you money to do it, and then arrested you when you moved forward?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
I heard about it on NPR. I remember when it happened.
I want someone to set up the FBI ask to meet them for bomb parts and then have the police waiting to arrest the FBI. Then maybe sue them for attempted entrapment.
The difference would be that the FBI would have no criminal intent, unlike Mohamed Osman Mohamud who was trying to blow people up in the name of Al Qaeda.
Have you researched this story? He was prompted to do this. He did not seek out the bomb on his own. He was encouraged by the FBI to find a bomb, pick a target, and try to blow it up.
Ironic, really, when you think about it, that the FBI was encouraging him to do something in the name of al qaeda.