It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The FBI ran a sting operation, pushing Mohamud to commit a terrorist act, all the way down to providing him with a fake bomb, which he subsequently attempted to detonate at the Christmas tree lighting, not knowing it was fake.
Entrapment is wrong.
To me, this seems like a blatant example of the next step towards a police state....
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The FBI ran a sting operation, pushing Mohamud to commit a terrorist act, all the way down to providing him with a fake bomb, which he subsequently attempted to detonate at the Christmas tree lighting, not knowing it was fake.
Entrapment is wrong.
To me, this seems like a blatant example of the next step towards a police state....
Perhaps you would prefer the FBI wait until he detonates a real bomb, killing shoppers, before they arrest him?
Originally posted by WeRpeons
If he wasn't the type of guy who wouldn't think of killing anyone, the FBI wouldn't have been able to bait him no matter how hard they tried.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I heard about it on NPR. I remember when it happened.
I want someone to set up the FBI ask to meet them for bomb parts and then have the police waiting to arrest the FBI. Then maybe sue them for attempted entrapment.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
I heard about it on NPR. I remember when it happened.
I want someone to set up the FBI ask to meet them for bomb parts and then have the police waiting to arrest the FBI. Then maybe sue them for attempted entrapment.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
I heard about it on NPR. I remember when it happened.
I want someone to set up the FBI ask to meet them for bomb parts and then have the police waiting to arrest the FBI. Then maybe sue them for attempted entrapment.
The difference would be that the FBI would have no criminal intent, unlike Mohamed Osman Mohamud who was trying to blow people up in the name of Al Qaeda.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
AMEN! I find it to be a very scary notion that people are ok with this type of thing.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Have you researched this story? He was prompted to do this. He did not seek out the bomb on his own. He was encouraged by the FBI to find a bomb, pick a target, and try to blow it up.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The FBI ran a sting operation, pushing Mohamud to commit a terrorist act, all the way down to providing him with a fake bomb, which he subsequently attempted to detonate at the Christmas tree lighting, not knowing it was fake.
Entrapment is wrong.
To me, this seems like a blatant example of the next step towards a police state....
Perhaps you would prefer the FBI wait until he detonates a real bomb, killing shoppers, before they arrest him?
Did you not read what I said? I do believe it is a good thing this person is off the streets. Do you think its ok for the FBI to decide someone is a 'bad guy' and then set them up so that they can be arrested? Is that your idea of freedom?
And what of the fact that they didnt have to set him up-they could have EASILY held him due to his interactions with al qaeda.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Have you researched this story? He was prompted to do this. He did not seek out the bomb on his own. He was encouraged by the FBI to find a bomb, pick a target, and try to blow it up.
One doesn't contact recruiters for Al Qaeda in an entirely law abiding mind.
Neither does one agree to plant bombs without the criminal intent to blow people up.
The FBI have removed a dangerous jihadist from the streets and they should be commended for their diligence.
Originally posted by Malcher
This is actually very common. Just watch ID television and plenty of shows where, usually a spouse, wants to hire a hit man and somehow law enforcement gets hold of it and poses as the hit man. That is only one example, there are others that are very similar.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
AMEN! I find it to be a very scary notion that people are ok with this type of thing.
How would you deal with people like Mohamed Osman Mohamud?
Wait until they successfully blow people up?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
And again, why go through all of that, when they could just as easily hold him under the patriot act?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
You commend a loss of freedom. Fair enough.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Why did the FBI go through all of this, when they could have just as easily held him based on the patriot act?
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
And again, why go through all of that, when they could just as easily hold him under the patriot act?
If they did that then the bleeding hearts would be on here and other places claiming the "FBI are holding a innocent man"