posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 08:35 AM
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!! Most of all pay no attention to Feinstein's "specific" list of banned weapons. That list means
absolutely nothing and is nothing more than a ruse.
I read this earlier this morning and just could not believe it. Thankfully someone is paying attention out their in cyber world because you probably
have not heard this yet. If you have, please share your thoughts.
The article cited covers many extreme flaws in Feinstein's legislation. However, I am focusing on the worst of them.
All semi-autos are outlawed, not just some. Pro-rights and anti-rights attention has been focused on the tremendous list of guns that would be
banned under Feinstein’s bill, which takes up a significant portion of the 122 pages of this proposal.
Here’s the problem none of the “news” reports have spotted:
The list of guns doesn’t matter.
Magazine size doesn’t matter.
If the semi-auto firearm has anything to grip it by, it is banned. (There is a grandfather clause for old stuff.)
It’s very clever actually.
According to the bill, any semiautomatic firearm that uses a magazine — handgun, rifle or shotgun — equipped with a “pistol grip,” would be
banned. That sounds like a limitation, but it is not.
A pistol grip (on page 2) is defined (on page 13) as “a grip, a thumb-hole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.” In
other words, the gun list does not matter. It is a smokescreen designed to distract people from the true meaning of the bill. And it has done a
magnificent job. It worked!
Any semi-automatic firearm that exists, with anything on it you can grip, is banned.
The list is meaningless tripe. It is camouflage for the real purpose of the bill. When the president said he is not going to take away your guns,
well, Feinstein’s bill puts the lie to that.
Yes, that includes all semi auto pistols too!!!!
P.S. There is a section in Feinstein’s bill referring to “grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapons” illegal under federal law section
922(v). Someone should tell her lawyers that 922(v) expired eight years ago and is no longer valid, so that section makes no sense, doesn’t describe
anything, and someone should slap those lawyers upside the head. It’s a small point.
Read more: dailycaller.com...
Please share this information with as many people as possible....