Columbia Shuttle Crew Not Told of Possible Problem With Reentry, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 31-1-2013 @ 10:24 PM by InTheFlesh1980
reply to post by GrantedBail



I think they made the right call. It is properly merciful to spare them the anxiety, especially in their last moments.

Better to be surprisingly engulfed in a ball of flame with no prior knowledge than to spend days in agonizing anticipation of such an event.


reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 12:26 AM by AdamOver
reply to post by samuel1990



I'm sure they do (or did) have a pill option. But when there is an 'if' scenario perhaps better not to take it.

I feel they did the right thing. Better not to know if death is imminent. Less time to dwell, less time to ponder. A slow form of torture.

I would rather not know.

/just my 2pence.



reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 12:56 AM by GrantedBail
reply to post by AdamOver



I never even thought of that; having a pill option. I would imagine that would have been part of their protocols, now that you mention it. I have thought about this for a couple of hours now. I think I would have wanted to know and be able to make my peace and take my pill. But, hey that is just me.


reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 02:39 AM by GrantedBail
reply to post by geldib



Wrong Challenger. These were the people that burned up in front of all of us. You are thinking of another voyage, which was just as devastating. This one was 03.


reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 06:52 AM by Brother Stormhammer
Originally posted by Robonakka
They could have went to the space station and had one of the astronauts there bring over a space suit and then ferried everyone over to the station. Then sent another shuttle to retrieve them. It was not hopeless. It was just easier to let them die.


Research is your friend. In this case, the amount of research is remarkably small: A quick look at the orbits of Columbia and the International Space station, a quick look at the specifications for the Orbiter, and a quick visit to Atomic Rocket / Project Rho to consult a few tables, and you can do all the calculations needed to determine whether or not Columbia had sufficient delta-v to match orbits with the I.S.S. If that's more than you care to do, I can save you some time and mouse pad wear and summarize the results in three words: "Not even close".

Research short-comings aside, your proposition doesn't make logical sense. Even if NASA (or the ever-popular, ever-shadowy "they") didn't mind losing seven highly trained astronauts, and didn't mind yet *another* public relations disaster, why would "they" casually write off a Shuttle orbiter? The loss of Columbia disrupted every major civilian space project underway at the time, and did the same for at least three major military programs.

One of the things that defines most conspiracies is the idea that someone (or several someones) is manipulating events for some form of gain....so, exactly who gained from Columbia's loss? NASA certainly didn't (see above re: schedule disruptions and public relations problems). The US Military didn't (see above, part II). The defense contractors didn't (no replacement Orbiter was fabricated). So...what made it "easier" for "them" to let Columbia and her crew die?


reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 09:52 AM by GrantedBail
reply to post by chasingbrahman



Wow! What a nice thought. I might just want to know so I could grind on the bastage one last time. LOL I would want to say goodbye to my kids though. We have community property in my state so I wouldn't be trippin on the IRS so much. Anyway...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags