It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

How to prove creationism FAKE

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 24 2013 @ 01:47 AM

Originally posted by Shema

Every person with the necessary intelligence and skills for living can recognize the likelihood that creation and evolution go hand in hand.

Really, creation is a "likelihood" (bolding mine), it is "likely" to go hand in hand with evolution? If you don't see that you lack intelligence?

I would say one is a certainty (evolution), while the other is an, as yet, completely unsupported possibility. One that seems to become less and less likely as knowledge grows.

Why are they always promoted as opposites?

Because one is so overwhelmingly supported as a scientific theory that it is now considered a common fact (evolution). The other is completely unsupported at this stage. The abiogenisis studies might soon wipe even this possibility out. The creation goalposts seem to be forever moving in reverse.

edit on 24-4-2013 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it.

new topics
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in