reply to post by Barcs
Text Do you have examples of the aforementioned books? Where do they just choose to believe things as facts that aren't backed by science? Science evolves as new knowledge is a available. Things are constantly changing, and evolving in science, so it makes sense to change the text books as we learn more. Would you prefer that they never changed and still had 1850 science material, like the archaic outdated bible?
Have been away from the keyboard for awhile and just now read your reply to my rant.
Barc, Let me try to get on your page instead of you on mine. You have a bitter disregard for the bible as is shown by your posting. That is your privilege to be sure and is the consensus of most all scientists. The bitterness may come from not understanding the Creator that created you, I really don’t know.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
The bible tells me that in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. I want you to remember that it was both heaven and earth. Regardless of how intelligent you are you have to realize that there was a start to all of what we see. If you will not even see that fact then there is no sense to go any further with this conversation.
The bible then tells us that that the Creator created this world and the heaven surrounding this world from material that was without form and was empty of life. Which heaven is it that is mentioned in this account? Is it the first heaven surrounding the world or the second heaven which we call the universe? This material that the Creator used was not formed but was still noted as material. How old was this material in your estimation? It is the same material that we see today. But then this material was not formed nor did it have life. If this material did not have life then you could not date that material with the use of fossils could you? Radioisotope dating is at best a theory. Why do I say this? If you are a fair person without bias then here are some sources that you asked me to show.
ISOCHRON ROCK DATING IS FATALLY FLAWED
by William Overn - Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (RATE)
Scientists associated with the Institute for Creation Research have finished an eight-year research project known as RATE, or Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth. For over a hundred years, evolutionists have insisted that the earth is billions of years old, and have arrogantly dismissed any views contrary to this belief. However, the team of seven creation scientists have discovered incredible physical evidence that supports what the Bible says about the young age of the earth.
Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their Formation Tested and Verified (#386) by Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D.
Radioisotope Dating of Grand Canyon Rocks: Another Devastating Failure for Long-Age Geology (#376) by Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D.
New Rate Data Support a Young World (#366) - by Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.
Carbon Dating Undercuts Evolution's Long Ages (#364) by John Baumgardner, Ph.D.
Radiohalos - Significant And Exciting Research Results (#353) by Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D.
Nuclear Decay: Evidence For A Young World (#352) by Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.
Potassium-Argon and Argon-Argon Dating of Crystal Rocks and the Problem of Excess Argon (#309) by Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D.
Evidence for a Young World (#384) by Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.
Did you know that your science now tells us that there is a third heaven? Not many bible bashers realize that fact nor want to bring the subject up. Your science now tells us that they admit that this universe is still expanding, and at a tremendous rate at that. What is this universe expanding into? Do you know? The old outdated bible says it is the third heaven and it told you that many hundreds of years before your science saw it. So now hundreds of years later your science says that they can prove the universe has a container which we have always called the third heaven.
If the universe is still expanding then God is still creating. My outdated bible has never said that God quit creating. It says that God rested on the seventh day. That resting period is now long gone and your science now tells me that my Creator is still creating. As the universe expands so it is filled with matter and that my friend is called creating and not just a happening by any means. After His rest, God continued to create and His timely creating
is what you are seeing as evolution. God creates daily (even as we speak). Read what other scientists have also studied and open your mind.