EU Set to Ban Animal Testing for Cosmetics Forever, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times
Topic started on 30-1-2013 @ 05:32 PM by TechUnique

EU Set to Ban Animal Testing for Cosmetics Forever


www.adnkronos.com
Campaign pioneers The Body Shop and Cruelty Free International celebrate after 20 years of activism After over 20 years of campaigning, ethical beauty retailer The Body Shop and non-profit organisation Cruelty Free International are finally celebrating the end to animal testing for cosmetics in Europe with the anticipated announcement that the import and sale of animal tested cosmetic products and ingredients is to be banned in the EU on 11 th March 2013.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 30-1-2013 @ 05:40 PM by skepticconwatcher
reply to post by TechUnique



Good. I think testing product is very old fashioned anyway. They have the technology now where they can grow human skin in a lab and test it that way. I worked for a company that specializes in cosmetics and skin care and they showed us the video during training. I don't understand why all companies do not do it this way. Leave the animals alone.



reply posted on 30-1-2013 @ 05:46 PM by TechUnique
Originally posted by skepticconwatcher
reply to
post by TechUnique



Good. I think testing product is very old fashioned anyway. They have the technology now where they can grow human skin in a lab and test it that way. I worked for a company that specializes in cosmetics and skin care and they showed us the video during training. I don't understand why all companies do not do it this way. Leave the animals alone.


They most likely do not do it that way because it would be much cheaper to test on animals. Any unethical practice on a company's part tends to be down to money

Oh well they'll HAVE to start getting with the times. Hopefully the rest of the world will follow suit. This truly is unprecedented!


reply posted on 30-1-2013 @ 05:54 PM by AdAstra
reply to post by TechUnique



I can't wait to see how those who see the EU as the devil incarnate will interpret this one....

All I can say is, no matter what the reason (and I believe it to be public pressure), it is a very welcome move.


reply posted on 31-1-2013 @ 11:13 AM by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by theMediator



Because when they do these tests they rub these cosmetics into the animals eyes, mouth, throat, ears, possibly even their genitals. When products are in early stages there are many chemicals that could possibly cause irritation, inflamation, boils, ulcers, blindness, deafness, possibly even death.

It's a cruel practice and if you don't see it that way then it sucks to be you.


reply posted on 1-2-2013 @ 06:57 AM by MoonChild02
Originally posted by theMediator
Maybe I'm just dumb but I never understood how they test cosmetics on animals.

They don't need to feed them the cosmetics : they aren't required to be non-toxic orally.

What could they ever put that is new that could suddenly be bad : They must have a pretty big list of what works/what doesnt, whats dangerous/whats not.

Are the animals abused when they suffer the evil consequences of wearing skin lotions, mascara and shampoo?
: my dogs and cats usually don't like to take their bath but they get used to it.

Why would they need to test in absurd, deadly and evil ways products that are made to "enhance" beauty?

I mean, I love animals and I want their full happiness but I don't see whats so wrong with animal testing for cosmetics. Cancer/bacteria/virus experiments on animals are much more evil yet, all we see is that we shoudn't be abusing animal for COSMETICS testing.

I really don't get it, someone enlighten me on why the testing practices done on animal for cosmetics are ban worthy enough?

They take the products and put them in the animals eyes - purposely - to test just how bad a reaction a human might have. They do make the animals eat the products as well. The products contain a number of things that, if digested, would be carcinogens. Chemical reactions from mixtures also burns the fur and skin of the animals.

The difference between testing on cosmetics and for medical purposes is that cosmetics testing is not needed because, like you said, they have a list of what works and what doesn't, plus they have alternatives and other ways to test chemical reactions. Furthermore, cosmetics are not needed if they are not for medical use, like CoverFX is (although that brand still doesn't test on animals). Medical testing is fine because they can save people's lives, and sometimes the lives of other non-human animals. Testing cosmetics, not so much.

Here's the info you need to know about animal testing for consumer products:
www.aavs.org...
Please, educate yourself. These companies purposely do things they know will injure those poor rabbits. It's sad and sickening. Rabbits are the sweetest animals on the planet, are extremely smart and compassionate - I speak from experience.

More info:
www.leapingbunny.org...
www.crueltyfreeinternational.org...

List of cruelty-free cosmetics:
www.mybeautybunny.com...

Proud to support cruelty free!
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting now.
Today's Show: ATS Live:161:Trees,Ghosts,Phantom 'Copters,Pshop,Teaching,Jail,Violence,MajorTom,Animals,