posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 04:10 PM
All things being said concerning firearms must be looked at critically and under a microscope these days. It would be one thing if we had a sincere
government trying to implement changes in law to reflect a better society - but the reality we face is a corrupt government, bombing places overseas
while preaching peace, segregating demographs while preaching unity... etc etc.. What we have is a controlling government that is openly putting
foward an agenda against the right to own firearms. 'They' will be effective in their agenda through many many 'plays to the people' ( as you put it
Because we must be extremely critical in these current times, concerning firearms, I would definitely congratulate you OP for taking the time to
consider the thoughts you present here.
One of the things worth mentioning is that Giffords was shot in the head so any claims that her speech impediments were purposefully exacerbated in
conspiracy to gain more sympathy for her cause will be judged as entirely unprovable. What CAN be proven however is that her speech impediment due to
a gun crime in fact gains sympathy, so having her speak in general - even if she didn't have a speech impediment - only helps the agenda against guns
as her circumstance begs for sympathy. For that reason it should be known for fact is why she was allowed to speak.
edit on 1/30/2013 by
indigothefish because: (no reason given)