reply to post by elevenaugust
" Unfortunately, "UFO evidence" do not release any more informations, as far as I know... "
Not exactly, they included the testimony of the photographer or alleged photographer, why do
I say alleged? i'll tell you in detail but first this is the information:
Report by the witness:
"Hi, my name is [name removed per witness' request]. A relative of mine found your website and advised me to send this specifially to you. The reason
being is because, and i agree with her, that Rob (the November 2005 poster) and I may have captured the same object (or model?). This picture is from
earlier this year, August is my best bet. I'm almost certain. I would remember the date had i known i had taken a UFO in it, but just as Robert i had
not realized the image was on my camera. However in my case it was a few weeks later when i was cleaning out the flash card that it caught my eye.
"This took place in Jersey City, New Jersey. I had pulled over off the highway to buy some fruits at a very isolated fruit stand/store and i snapped a
picture of this warehouse in the lot over. I can solemnly affirm to you that it is not a prank and that i did not even see it when i took the picture.
In fact, i am about 95% percent sure that it wasn't even there, as i'm certain that i would have seen it. I believe this is also more or less the case
for Rob. This is image was taken with a Canon Digital Rebel XT and the mode was automatic and set for outdoors.
"Anyhow, this would not be the first time i've seen something like this. When i was 14 i saw a metal orb hovering over a shopping mall parking lot in
this same city. As much as i tried to have my family see it,they could not. There have been other instances, too. This is just the first time i've
been allowed to capture something as clear."
Date Reported: 12/31/2005 11:20:15 AM
Source / Credit: UFOEvidence.org Original source webpage / article
Photograph ID: 402 ID: 402
Is my opinion that this photo is a hoax because there are other two photographs with the same
object but in different places and this one seems to be a modified, rotated, retouched copy but
showing the same details including the little tail. the original photo has been declared a seagull.
Check the references in these links.
Nov 25 2005 in Vancouver Island Canada
November 14, 2004 - Dorchester, Dorset, United Kingdom
NOTE - Be adviced that the website UFO Evidence has a malicious script that opens an
undesired spam window that you can`t erase unless you close the browser in Windows or
Mac and if you have adblock the page simply doesn't open unless you pause the adblock,
very clever these guys so for your safety NEVER go to UFO Evidence.
edit on 30-1-2013 by free_spirit because: (no reason given)