It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
, Thu, 16 Oct 2012 23:57:18 +0800 (SGT) Received:
(qmail 18137 invoked from network), 16 Oct 2012 15:57:27 -0000
---
for, Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:57:18 +0800 (SGT) Received:
(qmail 18137 invoked from network), 24 Dec 2012 15:57:27 -0000
30.31 c30, 31
Subject: Iranian Issue
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2012 15:57:16-0000
---
Subject: Syrian Issue
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2012 15:57:16 -0000
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Philippines
I have a site that I access on ocasion that tends to post all there is about such things. I took about 10 minutes after looking at the E-Mails and some files before just stopping as it was obvious this was set up and was a hoax.
The very idea that a covert plan of this magnitude...and this would be BIG...VERY BIG...with Huge possibilities for monsterous issues if it went bad.
This fact alone is more than enough to let me know with close to 100% certainty that this is a set up.
Plus specific acts would never be detailed as only an Op's Code Name would appear on any files.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Laxpla
Like I said earlier...after spending 10 minutes looking at this stuff as well as laughing my ass off with a friend over how obviously fake this was...I decided that too look any further into it was a huge waste of time.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by Philippines
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Laxpla
Like I said earlier...after spending 10 minutes looking at this stuff as well as laughing my ass off with a friend over how obviously fake this was...I decided that too look any further into it was a huge waste of time.
Split Infinity
Ok, so let's suppose the emails are fake. That still leaves 2 things imo:
1. The Iraq folder info looks legit. Many docs and passport scans and other info. I assume this is to lend credibility to the Iranian and "Sirian" issues (the email is "Sirian Issue.eml"). Where did this internal Britam company info come from? A hacker, or an insider, or a Britam operation (which I doubt)?
2. Why is Britam still silent on this issue? If it was fake, then it's pretty easy to come forward and say it's fake. Still no word.
Just some more thoughts on this, emails aside
Originally posted by Laxpla
Originally posted by Philippines
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Laxpla
Like I said earlier...after spending 10 minutes looking at this stuff as well as laughing my ass off with a friend over how obviously fake this was...I decided that too look any further into it was a huge waste of time.
Split Infinity
Ok, so let's suppose the emails are fake. That still leaves 2 things imo:
1. The Iraq folder info looks legit. Many docs and passport scans and other info. I assume this is to lend credibility to the Iranian and "Sirian" issues (the email is "Sirian Issue.eml"). Where did this internal Britam company info come from? A hacker, or an insider, or a Britam operation (which I doubt)?
2. Why is Britam still silent on this issue? If it was fake, then it's pretty easy to come forward and say it's fake. Still no word.
Just some more thoughts on this, emails aside
Britam is not silent about it, they came forward and said they were hacked and many things inside are real but the emails are faked. The overwhelming evidence goes along side with the press release they had. They placed two forged emails in an otherwise unimpressive load of data, without these emails the dump would have gotten little attention.
It's like this, you try to get into a bar with a fake ID, you don't just walk in alone when you are alone and no one is around you, you walk in with the crowd with real ID's.
Anyone can look at the emails and right off the bat spot on how bad these emails are forged, I showed you three SIGNIFICANT errors in the emails.
edit on 1-2-2013 by Laxpla because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wujotvowujotvowujotvo
reply to post by Philippines
This might be, Voice of Russia
ruvr.co.uk/2013_01_30/Britam-security-hack/
Infowars updated their article with that link, but none of the western mainstream media posted anything after Daily Mail deleted the news...
The passports remain undisputed as for them being false.edit on 1-2-2013 by wujotvowujotvowujotvo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wujotvowujotvowujotvo
reply to post by Philippines
The text tells nothing.
The audio that is important. It's 6 minutes of audio, forward to 50 second mark to hear the Britam chief executive.
I edited the passport line, I said no person proved the scans fake.
The chief executive said nothing of the rest, he focused on the emails and said some of the content are true....
Originally posted by michaelmcclen
...
Not only that but it has a comments sections.....oh joy I wonder what the sheep will make of this as most MSM sites are careful which stories are allowed to have comments *ahem* BBc.
...