U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'

this is what I like to see they are caught red handed ... if only people would stop and spend 3 min of there day to read this I for one know that the war in Syria is bull# and that Assad didn't start it. it was government propaganda specialist that stated the war in in Syria and I really don't believe that Assad would use chemical weapons on his own people.. as he has stated before to the media but that exactly what the US needs for them to go to war and kick hi out of power is a bluff and the #ed up thing is the message even says what kind of weapon to use.. and that they want to use a Russian weapon and a Russian speaking people to do it so they can get Russia to look bad to Americans as well its would be killing two birds with one stone....... dirty dirty men rule this world...

reply to post by CALGARIAN


Where can i find these emails??

It seems to me like this is such a hot issue because it is true. This hacker didn't even play the cat/mouse game that Anonymous is doing -- he just released a lot of sensitive information, including the email about Syria. Part of me thinks that this is a controlled release and there is a lot more communication that was not released. That, or he only had access to less than 5 emails, and a lot of processes, policies, and company info. Things like...

- HR Spreadsheet showing employee info, SS#, Passport #, emergency contact info.. and more.
- Bank account #s
- Many many passport scans
- Salary information and names for Iraqi nationals working
- Contracts/proposals and values with other companies (per month or day)
- Communication and plans for Iran, with mention of Saudi approval for Britam Participation

Please see attached details of preparatory measures concerning the Iranian issue. Participation of Britam in the operation is confirmed by the Saudis.

- And other meeting minutes etc.

Meanwhile, Anonymous has not released any "redacted" docs or anything else. I wonder how long this will continue to be suppressed?

reply to post by Xcathdra

Ironic how people are so quick to jump on this wagon while ignoring anything that comes out in the same manner against Syria or Iran.

Even less ironic how you seem to jump out the woodwork every time this comes up and say stuff like that. You are only the second poster on this thread. What "people" have had time to ignore anything? Except the Irony of Anti Iran and Assad rhetoric.

Hot Fudge WMD with a syrupy topping of "Bad presidents" anyone?

reply to post by tierdofbs


Take this as you will...but speaking from experience I do not see this as a plan the U.S. Intel. groups would either use or even much less likely...allow such a plan to be LEAKED!

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY....ZERO PERCENT PROBABILITY...that is our Intel. Groups were actually going to implement such a plan...that the plan would be leaked as it has supposedly been as told in this release.

Leaks of this nature of an action that would be highly classified...just do not get leaked! The people who implement such extremely sensitive plans are seasoned and highly professional to a fault.

This is a leak generated by Russia, Syria, Iran or a few others.

Split Infinity

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by MisterMandlebrot

 

As far as Black Propaganda...this is done by the NSA not the CIA.

The CIA is a tool that unfortunately has become available to Poloticians. In the past this was much less true and there are various depts. in the CIA that are connected with other U.S. Intel. Groups that have a level of clearance that is much higher than that of any member of Congree or even a standing U.S. President.

This was done and made so as to not allow some Politician who was up for reelection to use the CIA or any information they could have clearance to know and use this to get reelected.

A very good example of this is when President Carter was being portrayed by Reagan as soft on Defense...Carter made public the existence of Stealth Technology. The CIA, NSA, DIA and USAF almost HAD KITTENS! And although this was not enough to get Carter reelected the damage was done as we were flying Stealth Aircraft directly over the Soviet Union without their knowledge and after this release the Soviets concentrated on IR-LIGHT Detection.

Split Infinity

That kinda all goes out the window when a former director of the CIA serves as both Vice President and President, and then he goofy son a decade later.

reply to post by Swills


Your RIGHT! LOL!

When it came to Bush Sr...he knew EVERYTHING.

Split Infinity

reply to post by SplitInfinity

Since Syria is already well along the path where it's Government will eventually fall...

After two years you can say that? Tst, tsk...

With the whole of Western MSM, NATO, the insurgents, and all manner of aid by collaborative Arabs from the Kingdom of Saud, Qatar and Bahrain behind his demise, you think the Syrian Government would have folded by now?

The reason it hasn't is because the syrian Army and the people of Syria are firmly behind not only their government and military but against all those who wage aggressive guerrilla war from outside their country's borders.

Originally posted by kennylee
The linked article says "According to Infowars".....

Really? How many times has Alex Jones been right in the last 10 years?

He's been right and wrong, and somewhere in the middle, over these years but haters love to dwell on what he didn't get right. Haters gonna hate. How many times has the US Gov't gotten it wrong and none of them are ever held responsible but yet we are supposed to trust them.

In any case, Jones got this info from a man in Texas who called into his show claiming to be working with Anonymous and had hacked info about these Syrian chemical weapons. Jones told the guy to post them online on his own, perhaps make a YouTube video, but the caller was telling Jones he was emailing his show all the info he had so Jones obliged to look at it and of course liked what he saw and now here we are.

Originally posted by CALGARIAN


Of course we all speculated this was in the works, but most thought the Israeli administration would load the gun but seems US took charge.

So if, or when, Chemical Weapons are used what do we do? Blame rebels? Blame US backed rebels? Blame Assad? Malitia?

We have no idea now what's happening on the ground.


www.dailymail.co.uk...

www.dailymail.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

I see what your saying but I also think it is safe to say this was done in collusion between Washington and Israel. I doubt one would take this kind of step without approval from the other.

reply to post by Xcathdra

All is fair when Iran has nukes and Syria has chemical / biological weapons.

Proof of "Iranian nukes" is elusive... unless you got some, I call propaganda.

But by your criteria, any country owning these things is fair game, I guess. Geez your view of the world is bleak.

It spawned a slogan once.

"Kill 'em all, Let god sort 'em out."

reply to post by intrptr


No...the reason why the Syrian Government has not fallen is the complete and utter ineptitude of European members of NATO.

Syrian Leadership is holding on to power through Military force and subjudication of the majority population by force. If the Europen Leaders had taken a different road of NATO involvement...the Syrian Leadership would have been long gone.

It is this lack of ability to pull the trigger all the way that gets more people killed as a quick and decisive Military Effort usually has less casualties than a long drawn out protracted limited war.

Since the vast Majority of the Syrian Population is in revolt or supports it...if NATO were to do what is necessary...these actions would be supported by the Syrian Population and thus the Majority of people in the Middle East.

Split Infinity

Originally posted by explorer14

Leaked: The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor...

While I wouldn't be surprised if this were true, I'm having a hard time believing it.

The article has a Sorcha Faal feel to it - in my opinion.

Seems the truth is always hidden under a great big pile of lies anymore.

InfoWars, Sorcha Faal.. What's the difference?

Originally posted by clay2 baraka

Originally posted by explorer14

Leaked: The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor...

While I wouldn't be surprised if this were true, I'm having a hard time believing it.

The article has a Sorcha Faal feel to it - in my opinion.

Seems the truth is always hidden under a great big pile of lies anymore.

InfoWars, Sorcha Faal.. What's the difference?

A huge difference is that any people with basic search engine skills could use the information posted in this thread to find the files are out there for download and make the judgment call themselves.

So far it doesn't sound like anyone in this thread has seen the files... Not saying I have

reply to post by clay2 baraka


Well for one Sorcha deals in hoaxes. In fact, anything related to her posted on ATS is usually 404'd. Not true with Alex Jones, although ATS (mostly), staff included, hates Jones.

reply to post by SplitInfinity

Take this as you will...but speaking from experience I do not see this as a plan the U.S. Intel. groups would either use or even much less likely...allow such a plan to be LEAKED!

Disagreed. I understand "leak" of this type information. Panetta, Obama and Hillary have all publicly stated that if any use of chemical weapons occurs in Syria, there will be "consequences". We have all seen the rabbit abuse video, what else you need to put two and two together? Its called keeping your options open by misinforming the public with fresh layer of composted WMD.

Since Nato is behind the rebels, I shall expect this scenario, not dismiss it. But if it ever actually occurs you watch... the casualties will be civilians and Syrian Army, not the "rebels".

reply to post by intrptr


The one thing I was taught about my sometimes JOB is that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES is an Op enacted or even considered if a MOTIVE can be traced back to it.

I cannot think of any example that is more clear as to what absolutely cannot be done as the one we are discussing.

Split Infinity

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by SplitInfinity

 

Take this as you will...but speaking from experience I do not see this as a plan the U.S. Intel. groups would either use or even much less likely...allow such a plan to be LEAKED!

Disagreed. I understand "leak" of this type information. Panetta, Obama and Hillary have all publicly stated that if any use of chemical weapons occurs in Syria, there will be "consequences". We have all seen the rabbit abuse video, what else you need to put two and two together? Its called keeping your options open by misinforming the public with fresh layer of composted WMD.

Since Nato is behind the rebels, I shall expect this scenario, not dismiss it. But if it ever actually occurs you watch... the casualties will be civilians and Syrian Army, not the "rebels".

Wait huh? Why does he think the US leaked this? This info came from hacked emails.

Of course the US Gov't can and will set up Syria so they can invade while using their Al Qaeada puppets who we are supposed to be fighting against.

Gosh darn it I gave up my privacy and liberties to fight terrorism not to support it, aid it, feed it, arm it to invade Middle Eastern countries.

Just kidding, I didn't give them up, they were taken away from me thanks to a former CIA directors son and his silly gang of criminals.

reply to post by Swills


You know...the CIA was originally set up to be an entity that could not be swayed by Politics. Unfortunately through both Democratic and Republican CIA CHIEF appointments...which a person of late has been given even though they do not have the necessary experience and as well that they made certain promises to get appointed...the Agency has become easily swayed.

I would LOVE for this to change as in the past Agency Heads were chosin for their abilities to dothe job right...not their ability to do what they were told.

Split Infinity

reply to post by SplitInfinity


Eh, I disagree it but we all have our own opinions. The CIA could have been used for good but instead its been used to all the wrong reasons pretty much since its inception and that's mostly because of politics.