Majority of smokers do not have lung disease?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 29-1-2013 @ 10:48 AM by ZeroReady
I used to smoke. I quit because I was scared of getting lung cancer. To me it sounded like if you smoke, you will die from lung disease. It became all I thought about and eventually I just quit. Now this jerk goes and says this:
Lungs from pack-a-day smokers safe for transplant, study finds

Only about 20 percent of smokers actually develop the worst effects of smoking, noted Hachem.


The majority of people who smoke do not have lung disease,” said Hachem,

- Dr. Ramsey Hachem, a pulmonologist and transplant surgeon

You're kidding me right? Everything said about cigarettes these days is about how they will kill you. Now they're saying only a minority of smokers develop lung disease?

I know people still die from lung cancer, and this one guy saying this does not really ease my fears about the whole thing, but it makes me wonder.

Even when I did smoke my daily routine included, and still includes, riding a bike 6 miles a day, 3 mile run, 2 mile hike through the woods. Every day. I'm never out of breath or coughing.

Now my dad on the other hand gets out of breath walking up a flight of stairs.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 10:54 AM by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by ZeroReady


After watching someone very close to me die as hard as I could ever think to see in a hospital setting....due to a highly aggressive smoking related lung cancer? Well..They may have some truth in this. Look at George Burns, after all. Not every smoker dies of it.

However.... Coming up snake eyes on that gamble means a death worse than most would want to imagine, IMO. Is it worth it for the puffs on the cancer stick? Seeing it in person brought me to quit as a life time smoker by whatever means it took and I did. over 2 years now with no regrets and no cravings to this day, once I was 100% clear and nicotine detox'ed.

It's up to the smoker I guess.....but in a world full of things to gamble on and with? This is the last thing I think anyone would WANT to if they all had seen what some of us have in holding the hand of a loved one torn to pieces by that damned cancer.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 10:55 AM by sulaw
reply to post by ZeroReady



Uhmmm, well i'm a smoker. Normally a half pack or if it is a " Rainy " day in the office maybe a full pack. I do work out. And still run 1-2miles a day, cardio baby~yea~!!!

I also have friends who are the same type of smoker and they do they additionally run 1-2miles a day if not 5miles.

Is smoking bad? Well the chemicals they use are very dangerous. I will agree 100% , though makes me think, i've been smoking for at least 15 years.. Better half of my life no health issues.

Just wanted to add to the OP... As i'm not a scientist or have an MBA but I do have my daily routine and one hell of a weird body type I guess. Star for you~ Never new a experiment like this was ever documented.



reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 10:56 AM by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by ZeroReady



Your dad is older than you!

Besides that, Ismoke nad don't have disease that I know of. My grandmother smokes and has done for 72years, no lung disease. My grandad smoked for 65years, no lung disease. Bowell cancer and dementia got the better of him. R.I.P Grandad.

eta:: My mum has smoked for 45years, no lung disease. Maybe we just have good genes.
edit on 29-1-2013 by Wide-Eyes because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:06 AM by solve
reply to post by ZeroReady



no matter what science says, smoking is bad m`kay?
iam trying to quit it but its hard for me,,,

bu the way, someone has a cool avatar... big trouble in little china..


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:12 AM by ajay59
reply to post by jhn7537



Yes, and we all know how honest and caring the government is toward us! Ruff...ruff, little sheep. Head this way!




reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:15 AM by toastyr










reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:18 AM by jhn7537
Originally posted by ajay59
reply to
post by jhn7537



Yes, and we all know how honest and caring the government is toward us! Ruff...ruff, little sheep. Head this way!



So are you denying the stats the Govt. releases about tobacco?


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:22 AM by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by jhn7537





Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death.


So you're saying that TPTB would want to prevent population death....?

Hah...doubt it. Various diseases, natural and artificial ones, play in to "their" hands. Only it's not politically correct to say it publicly.

Imagine that no one has ever died from smoking related disease? or any other preventable ones?

We would be over populated in the next 100 years.

The studies about harmful effects of tobacco have been done for some time now. They are out in the open and accepted by the establishment. We apparently know the full effects of smoking.

So why don't they ban it ? completely?

Why can you legally buy poison, not only that, it is advertised even....?

I'm a smoker...but I would support the full ban on tobacco products....so why don't they just do it for the sake of public health...? Don't they want their public to stay alive and healthy?




reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:24 AM by ajay59
reply to post by jhn7537



Do I really need to, given the gov's track record? You are perfectly welcome to believe in whatever lie they want to tell you, I on the other hand, choose to believe in what I observe and experience.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:27 AM by jhn7537
Originally posted by ajay59
reply to
post by jhn7537



Do I really need to, given the gov's track record? You are perfectly welcome to believe in whatever lie they want to tell you, I on the other hand, choose to believe in what I observe and experience.


So because the Govt. lied before they must be lying about tobacco??? So in your world you either believe everything or believe nothing, that's nice... So please tell me how great cigarettes and tobacco are, because reading what they Govt. says they suggest it's god awful for you. So going off your logic they must be wrong or lying, so PLEASE educate me on the subject of tobacco and cigarettes...
edit on 29-1-2013 by jhn7537 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 11:29 AM by jhn7537
reply to post by JibbyJedi



It's your personal choice to smoke, but why would you ever smoke 2 packs of cigarettes a day? Why would you pay $12-15 bucks per day to inhale known toxins? I just don't get it... Maybe you can enlighten me. I get you're addicted, but why not try to quit?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Cooking With Aluminum Foil Should Be Avoided
  Posted 16 days ago with 43 member flags
"US teen invents advanced cancer test using Google"
  Posted 17 days ago with 38 member flags
A virus that kills cancer: the cure that\'s waiting in the cold
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags
Stem cells bring back feeling for paralysed patients
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
Gruenenthal\'s thalidomide apology \'insulting\'
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags