It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by SpearMint
Word, you pulled that out of where the sun doesn't shine. Basically evolutionist and creationist would refute you. At least from the articles I have seen and what my professor has taught.edit on 29-1-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
With enough random nonsense posts, I am hoping to create a spaghetti monster.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by chrome413
Originally posted by SpearMint
I can't tell if you're joking or being serious. Just because the word "theory" is used, it doesn't mean it's just a theory, that is not what it means in the scientific world.
Ummmm. . . yeah, that is what theory means. You see, this is how science works: First you have a Hypothesis, then a Theory and once that theory is rigorously tested again and again it becomes a Law. They teach us this in second grade- along with the scientific method.
A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment".
Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and do not make apodictic propositions; instead, they aim for predictive and explanatory force.
I recommend burning down the school you went to second grade at.
Originally posted by WarriorOfLight96
Surely if evolution happens at some point in our human existence we should be able to see some sort of evolution take place in some species, their millions of years could have surely expired by now.
Originally posted by ObservingTheWorld
You all realize you all are wrong on both the 'creation' and 'evolution' arguments. We are just computer simulations. Prove me wrong. You can't. It doesn't matter what books you want to read or even your so called physical evidence, they are just part of the simulation. So your so called science and your so called god are just a bunch of hooey.
So now that you know both 'creation' and 'evolution' are both false, what do you have to say?
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by definity
Come on youtube! I'm waiting ten minutes for this 2 minute clip. It better be worth it!
Well, I hate to say it, but the guy has a point.