posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 08:08 PM
reply to post by TheSubversiveOne
It appears you are arguing in and for the positive [aka supporting OP's negetive postion on new age resource vampires] with your stated opinion and
yet you offer AfterInfinity positive affirmations [which your posts seem to disavow] as found on youtube that are a pre-packaged simplex meme [aka a
mental lego brick] with which to support your side of the argument!
That ^^^ makes no complex sense ... unless you are being snobbishly sarcastic and refuse to acknowledge it as such. If not then please deny MY
Because when you say they have 'no power' ... in an of handed way without logically and reasonably qualifying your stated 'opinion' your posts come
across as foolishly biased and unfounded.
What therefor, do you solidly found your claim that the newage dogma has 'no power', which I mostly agee is just old age dogma rebooted for this
current era's set of childlike Gods, upon?
Holding an unfounded opinion is fine IMO ...but don't get upset when you are directly called on it and you are unable to provide what was asked for.
To do so would attract me to deeply focused attention upon such posts to this thread with a white hot passionate desire to alert upon them at the
soonest sign of any hypocritical attitude.
Personal Disclosure: Such an outcome would be unfavorable and higly unpleasant for everyone concerned!
You are responsible for EVERYTHING you post as a member of abovetopsecret.com, regardlless of forum, and ATS
require the following ...
15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal
information from any member. You will not use information gathered from this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.
So will you man up or do I have to seek a because you seriously risk being
edit on 29-1-2013 by OmegaLogos because: Edited to fix broken bbcode for emoticons.
edit on 29-1-2013 by OmegaLogos because:
Edited for same reason above.
edit on 29-1-2013 by OmegaLogos because: Edited to redact a repeated 'the'.