It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Still works for me, customers even get a nice discount if they pay by cash instead of cheque
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by FortAnthem
Hey what happen to old cash system and checking accounts?
Start paying with cash or write your checks.
Actually, this is happening in one of the 40 states that had previously prevented the banksters from charging those fees so the retailers haven't yet raised their prices to reflect the new costs.
The change in surcharges is the result of a settlement following a 2005 lawsuit between a group of retailers and MasterCard, Visa and other financial institutions.
The retailers claimed those groups conspired to fix the added charges.
The checkout fee is no longer banned in 40 states , but it is still illegal in New York and Connecticut.
The article was pretty clear; this was banned in 40 states until the banksters had their courts overturn the state's laws.
The retailers claimed those groups conspired to fix the added charges.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by FortAnthem
I can certainly understand them wanting to do that.
Most retailers lose that 4% on every purchase. Because of the surcharge that some credit card companies charge.
And usually some processors don't pay up right away.
And then you have charge backs and whatnot.
Sometimes taking a card is a losing experience. Especially with Amex if the costumer complains.
So don't complain about the stores charging the extra fee. Complain about the processors being a hassle to deal with.
What the Credit Card Interchange Settlement Means for Financial Institutions
Key provisions of the proposed settlement include the following:
◦Cash Payment – The card networks and bank participants in the suit will make a $6.05 billion payment to the retail participants.
◦Temporary Interchange Reduction – A 10 basis-point reduction in credit card interchange rates will be implemented for eight months, estimated to equal approximately $1.2 billion. This interchange reduction will be paid out to retail participants in the suit and deducted from the interchange revenue of all institutions. It is estimated that this reduction would result in a 5 percent reduction in interchange revenue for that eight-month period.
◦Surcharging – The card networks and banks will eliminate network prohibitions on retail surcharges for customers who use credit and charge cards at point of sale, subject to a cap and significant consumer disclosures by the retailers. In essence, this permits the merchant to impose a checkout fee at the cash register for the use of the card.
◦Injunctive Relief – The settlement includes provisions removing the ability of all merchants to challenge network rules on point-of-sale issues, including interchange price setting. It also includes merchant concessions that address retailer competitiveness concerns over interchange rules.
Mr. Charles said he did not expect much of the payment, which includes more than $6 billion in cash and an eight-month reduction in credit card transaction fees worth $1.25 billion, to reach him. And while the settlement is noteworthy because it allows merchants for the first time to charge more when customers pay with a credit card, Mr. Charles said he had no plans to do so. (In the past, credit card companies have not objected to retailers, like gas stations, that give a discount to customers who pay cash.)
But even if he wanted to impose a surcharge, Mr. Charles is one of many merchants who would not be able to, because of a sort of Catch-22 provision in the settlement that makes it effectively impossible for establishments that accept American Express to take advantage of the new rules.
But American Express has its own rule that says merchants must treat every form of electronic payment equally — and that means that to add the surcharge to American Express transactions, the merchant would have to add it to every other card it accepted, including debit cards. But both Visa and MasterCard prohibit surcharges on debit cards — Catch-22! — which effectively means merchants cannot add a surcharge to any transaction.
Some merchants and retail advocates, including four organizations that are plaintiffs in the lawsuit, oppose the deal because, they say, it offers too little and will make it harder to take legal action against credit card companies in the future. The settlement is still subject to court approval and is unlikely to become official before the middle of next year.
“There’s nothing there,” said Mallory Duncan, senior vice president and general counsel at the National Retail Federation, a trade association that was not involved in the lawsuit. He called the cash and fee reductions a “drop in the bucket” compared with the amount banks had overcharged merchants to process credit cards.
Originally posted by WildWorld
Gas stations where I live do this. You pay more per gallon if you're using a credit card instead of cash.