It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by orfeo8
Heh, I'm canadian and i'm watching the elections too. I don't really care for america but if any of the sayings are true and Bush leads the 3rd world war hell then even the canucks gotta be there to see the excitement(or lack thereof) unfold.
Originally posted by Gools
Hey Relentless:
I get the point.
I'm also worried about what I called the in-between time on a mud-pit thread I stared about the same thing.
No matter the outcome of the election Bush is Commander-in-Chief until the Innauguration.
[edit on 10/28/2004 by Gools]
Originally posted by just_a_pilot
In the case of a tie the House votes for President and the Senate for Vice President.
Originally posted by JCMinJapan
Ok, you flip a coin! the winner is the President the Loser is the Vice Pres. anyways, they are basically the same people with different words. They are both LAWYERS.... Would you expect anything different?
Originally posted by just_a_pilot
Originally posted by JCMinJapan
Ok, you flip a coin! the winner is the President the Loser is the Vice Pres. anyways, they are basically the same people with different words. They are both LAWYERS.... Would you expect anything different?
Wow, when did Dubya pass the bar?
Originally posted by metalmessiah
personally, I think we would actually be better off without a President given the choices I have today. get to the polls and vote NO!!!
Originally posted by Relentless
Is it worrying anyone at this point with the polls split right down the middle on the US elections, the situation the US could be in by the end of next week?
If the election gets challenged and drags on how does a potential lame duck (Bush - the term for an outgoing political figure between the election and the end of their term) or a potential future president (Kerry) but who knows, new guy accomplish anything? Seems to me the rest of the world would not deal with us at all until the election is decided.
Where does this put us in the war? Where does this put our guys over there with no clear leader and a REALLY uncertain future?
Does it occur to anyone that we are in a too precarious position right now to be a country without a clear leader? (Recent threats of blood in the streets paling in contrast to 9/11).
Seems to me the challenges that may occur after the election could be what takes us out, there are so many implications if we don't have a clear leader after the election Tuesday.
I almost wish everyone would commit now to whatever the outcome, let the chips fall where they may. We can't afford a debacle like that with the state of affairs they way they are. Maybe to show good faith for the greater good of the Country both candidates should agree right now that if there is not a clear winner, neither has a majority confidence of the people, but we need to move on - flip a coin.
Originally posted by Relentless
Originally posted by metalmessiah
personally, I think we would actually be better off without a President given the choices I have today. get to the polls and vote NO!!!
Another one who missed the point (boat?)
We can't be a country without a clear leader right now. We are in a dead heat - this is not good!
I give up.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
In the unlikely event that the scenario you described comes to be, then there would be called a global time out and everyone would go about his own business, peacefully, until such time as the election is decided, at which time all hostilities would resume.