It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
I could be wrong here, but isn't Zionism sort of like the Israeli version of the neocons us Americans have dominating everything?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Guarnere09
Actually, the Prophet Mohammed considered the Jews to be one of the "people of the Book," who should be tolerated by the Faithful. There is no Qu'ranic precedent or foundation for opposing Zionism.
Isaacs opposed Zionism partly because he disliked nationalism of all kinds and saw Zionism as a form of Jewish national chauvinism—and partly because he saw the Zionist agitation in Palestine as disloyalty to the British Empire to which he was devoted. When Zionist terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in 1946 he wrote that "the honour of Jews throughout the world demands the renunciation of political Zionism". Isaacs' main objections to Political Zionism were:-
“A negation of Democracy, and an attempt to revert to the Church-State of bygone ages.
Provocative anti-Semitism.
Unwarranted by the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate, or any other right; contrary to Zionist assurances to Britain and to the Arabs and in present conditions unjust to other Palestinians politically and to other religions.
As regards unrestricted immigration, a discriminatory and an undemocratic camouflage for a Jewish State.
An obstruction to the consent of the Arabs to the peaceful and prosperous settlement in Palestine of hundreds of thousands of suffering European Jews, the victims of Nazi atrocities; and provocative of Moslem antagonism within and beyond the Empire, and consequently a danger to its integrity and safety.
Inconsistent in demanding on one hand, on a basis of a separate Jewish nationality everywhere Jews are found, Jewish domination in Palestine, and at the same time claiming complete Jewish equality elsewhere than in Palestine, on the basis of a nationality common to the citizens of every faith.”[14]
Isaacs said "the Zionist movement as a whole...now places its own unwarranted interpretation on the Balfour Declaration, and makes demands that are arousing the antagonism of the Moslem world of nearly 400 millions, thereby menacing the safety of our Empire, endangering world peace and imperiling some of the most sacred associations of the Jewish, Christian, and Moslem faiths. Besides their inherent injustice to others these demands would, I believe, seriously and detrimentally affect the general position of Jews throughout the world..".[15]
Originally posted by Guarnere09
From my understanding isn't zionism a hijacked religion of judasim? Backed by the rothschield or rockerfellers?
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
I could be wrong here, but isn't Zionism sort of like the Israeli version of the neocons us Americans have dominating everything?
A couple of the proposals at the peace conference. 1919.
a.Promote Jewish immigration and close settlement on the land, the established rights of the present non-Jewish population being equitably safeguarded.
I.There shall be for ever the fullest freedom of religious worship for all creeds in Palestine There shall be no discrimination among the inhabitants with regard to citizenship and civil rights, on the grounds of religion, or of race.
“His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
Actually, the Prophet Mohammed considered the Jews to be one of the "people of the Book," who should be tolerated by the Faithful
There is no Qu'ranic precedent or foundation for opposing Zionism.
That verse is abrogated by a later one saying you should kill them where you find them. If a jew tries to hide from a muslim behind a rock, the rock will cry out to the muslim "hey muslim, there is a jew hiding behind me, come and kill him" or something like that.
Originally posted by bigdohbeatdown
reply to post by DJW001
That verse is abrogated by a later one saying you should kill them where you find them. If a jew tries to hide from a muslim behind a rock, the rock will cry out to the muslim "hey muslim, there is a jew hiding behind me, come and kill him" or something like that.
Why don't they like Jews do you know? Is it because they 'deny' the word of Mohammed ? Do they dislike Jews more than other non-believers?
Seems odd to me, kind of weird exception to 'thou shall not kill'.. lol.
Is it anything to do with Book of Esther? I don't know much about the bible tbh, but I recall some stuff getting pretty bad for the Jews in Esther...edit on 28-1-2013 by bigdohbeatdown because: weird formatting
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by bigdohbeatdown
If there is any shame here on this thread, its is upon the persian apostate bootlickers everywhere, for supporting a barbaric leadership hell bent on religious supremacy, blaming mythical alphabet agencies without any substantiations and others, INSTEAD of looking at and accepting what the realities are now.
That apostate Khameni had claimed to be against nuclear weapons and its developement and made several fork tongued hypocritical BS about peace upon the world, and YET he dares not allow IAEA inspectors to check on those nuke sites? Why? Cut the BS - no one who is transparent, preach for tranparency, would hide something like this.
But BS he did, and now the region is thinking of arming themselves with nukes as well to protect from the mad infidel Khameni. How much of nuke proliferation in the world do you want now, with a world scared sh*tless without even nuke weapons but supposedly safe nuke stations such as the one in Fukishima right now?
Who had been killing innocent people around the world? Even that apostate admitted to funding terrorists. Why blame others, when this animal had already admitted in clear and publically to the slaughter of innocent men, women and children? Worse, need I go on to talk about his support for the 60,000 majority which are of sunni deads in the hand of his pet monster assad?
I can understand China's CCP govt and Russia Putin's efforts to let the sunni syrians die by thousands stopping children of the book - jews, christians, muslims and other fellow compassionate humans from action, as the CCP govt and putin are atheists and knows not Allah.
Even innocent Shias are against such sectarian slaughters by the apostates khameni and humanslayer assad, but unfortunately, the Shia sect had been hijacked by that apostate and sadly, ignorant and driven insane sunnis are tragically targetting innocent Shias instead of the apostate dogs.
Sunnis and the world have more to be worried about that persian apostate supremacists idealogy and cunning gameplay than the illusion and mythical minority will o' wasp 'zionism'. Like the awoken palestinians, the rest of the world is awake to that persian's shennigans.
Truth will prevail, as it always does.