posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 07:50 AM
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
reply to post by daaskapital
They are, and probably always have been, agents working for Intelligence Agencies.
"They" aren't anything of the sort.
In the same way that you are reading this on the internet, an "agent" could also be reading this on the internet. That makes both of you
Anonymous is a collective. It is not a group with a clear definition.
How would you know, considering they are "Anonymous?"
Anonymous would have to have a structure to it, somewhere in its core. I do not believe that they are just a collective of random people who hack
under the general term of "Anonymous."
As i said before, the FBI infiltrated Anonymous by making a deal with a high ranking Anonymous member who then spied on, and led the FBI to the homes
of other Anonymous members. This indicates to me, that Anonymous would have to have some type of hierarchy or system in place. This indicates to me
that Anonymous is not just a general term applying to random hackers.
The core of Anonymous definitely sounds like a specified group of individuals to me...and they have been infiltrated by Intelligence Agencies...so
again, i do not believe that they are fighting for our freedom...as they claim.
edit on 29-1-2013 by daaskapital because: sp