This thread was inspired by this thread, excellent thread that it is
Just to explain, whilst trawling through the image posted in that thread, I also noticed a ton of anomalies:
Now, I know a lot of the skeptics will say it's just rocks etc. but I have looked and relooked at these images, I am convinced that this debris,
washed here by the now evaporated river, which btw, is where you would most likely find all the remnants of what once was on the planet, is the
leftovers of an ancient civilization, there is no doubt in my mind, however, it is not the point of this thread.
A point raised in the above mentioned thread was of size ratio:
And another strange shaped anomaly from that image:
According to the scale bar, that anomaly would be 7-8cm in size, with the rest of anomalies of similar scale. I'm left asking myself a question, is
this genuinely the real size of the objects?
Whilst I admit, anything is possible in this subject, a mini civilization could have existed on Mars, I must admit, I find it unlikely. So another
question, what if NASA was lying about the scale size ratio? What better way to cover up these anomalies than by saying "oh, they're only a few cm
long, can't possibly be the leftovers of ancient carvings".
Would NASA lie about the size of the objects on Mars' surface in order to deceive those of us who can see what this stuff is?
27-1-2013 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)