It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HelenConway
reply to post by grainofsand
If i am honest I think England owes NI and Wales, so they should stay in the union if they want.
Originally posted by grainofsand
Originally posted by HelenConway
reply to post by grainofsand
If i am honest I think England owes NI and Wales, so they should stay in the union if they want.
That's cool but not funded by English taxes. As I said earlier, my family enjoy preferential public services in Wales (which I don't) but are subsidised by my taxes paid in England. That cannot be acceptable can it? Please feel free to make the case justifying it in this thread if you feel different though.
Originally posted by HelenConway
reply to post by grainofsand
If i am honest I think England owes NI and Wales, so they should stay in the union if they want.
That is not the case with Scotland who as I have said have destroyed England.
What I do not understand is why English people want that particular union to stand - i would like to understand, can someone enlighten me ?
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by threewisemonkeys
Hate to point out the obvious here but England already has its own parliament, it just imposes it's will on the Scottish and Welsh. In fact with a devolved Scotland and Wales, there would be little left but an English parliament.
Originally posted by threewisemonkeys
They dont need their own, they already have their own, they just need to take it back Ya get meh?
Hate to point it out, but England does not! England gave up it's Parliament in 1707 when the then Parliament of England & Wales merged with the Scottish one. Upon devolution, those countries got back their own representation while England remained without it's own legislature.
-snip-
We don't really need a seperate Parliament, all we need is a simple rule in the Commons preventing MP's from voting on matters outside their own country.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by HelenConway
Helen move to Edinburgh - you'll love it. 55% of the population wasn't even born there - the majority of that 55% come from England.
Or perhaps try out some of the more beautific areas of Scotland - the Western Isles or the highlands - you'll find many of English brethren there - while pricing the locals out of their own homes (but no matter). I mean they cleared the highlands for sheep a cpl of hundred years ago - now they've done it with 125% mortgages.
Please stop generalising about an entire nation (of 5.2 million people not 6 million).
And remember that even if we do vote for independence - we're not going anywhere - we'll still be here atop your northern border.
edit on 27-1-2013 by christina-66 because: (no reason given)
That is not the case with Scotland who as I have said have destroyed England.
Anyway I thought the Western Isles wanted to join with Denmark
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by HelenConway
Anyway I thought the Western Isles wanted to join with Denmark
Where did you get that notion from? The Outer Hebrides - off the West coast of Scotland - want to join with a country far off the east coast located just north of Germany? Strange
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by HelenConway
That is not the case with Scotland who as I have said have destroyed England.
With all due respect I honestly fail to see how you come to believe this - could you please humour me and again explain exactly how you think this is so?
You chose to ignore it so I'll ask again, please justify the situation where English taxes pay a disproportional amount to fund Wales, Scotland and NI while they retain the right to vote on solely English issues in parliament...you can't can you?
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by grainofsand
No - not such side tracking. What you have is consensus - and you don't know how to handle it
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by grainofsand
No - not such side tracking. What you have is consensus - and you don't know how to handle it
Cool, we have no argument then
Originally posted by christina-66my reference to consensus was in relation to the points raised in this thread about the unfairness of the Scots mp's having a say on English only matters and that the Barnett formula gives the English a rough deal.....I AGREE