It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
reply to post by HelenConway
Your claims about the Scots PMs destroying England are just that, claims, they can't be measured or put to the test because they only exist in your own head, which as far as I see is closed to visitors.
Yay for the English tories, those you'd have govern England permanently. I have to save you from that fate, Helen, I really do.
Originally posted by grainofsand
Urm, did you miss the bit that in Westminster the Welsh, Sctottish and Northern Irish MP's get to vote on issues which solely affect England...that is not an 'English' Parliament at all.
Originally posted by threewisemonkeys
Hate to point out the obvious here but England already has its own parliament, it just imposes it's will on the Scottish and Welsh. In fact with a devolved Scotland and Wales, there would be little left but an English parliament.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by grainofsand
Urm, did you miss the bit that in Westminster the Welsh, Sctottish and Northern Irish MP's get to vote on issues which solely affect England...that is not an 'English' Parliament at all.
Originally posted by threewisemonkeys
Hate to point out the obvious here but England already has its own parliament, it just imposes it's will on the Scottish and Welsh. In fact with a devolved Scotland and Wales, there would be little left but an English parliament.
I'm not a U.K. citizen, but I propose this:
For continuity and efficiency's sake, don't have a separate Parliament for England. However, for various issues which relate solely to England, the UK Parliament constituencies are subsetted only to English districts for voting.
Lass? I'm a bloke. regardless, what are you saying now? The unjust funding of Scotland, Wales and NI by English taxpayers is Labours fault?! How silly is that? And again, I don't see Scottish people fighting for an equitable solution. They won't because they'll be skint without the workers of England propping their administration up.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by grainofsand
Oh come on - I gave you a full response above. Take a look at it please. The West Lothian question was never resolved because the Scottish Executive came into being when the LABOUR party was in power in Westminster - they needed the Scottish Labour Mp's votes. It's not fair and it's not right (and I've already said that - now I've said it twice).
Come on lass - get the reading comprehension skills up to speed.
I think Scotland needs to have its independence ASAP. Hopefully this will happen, then the English at least will be more fairly represented in parliament and that will reduce the need for an exclusive English parliament actually.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by HelenConway
I think Scotland needs to have its independence ASAP. Hopefully this will happen, then the English at least will be more fairly represented in parliament and that will reduce the need for an exclusive English parliament actually.
Well well well - problem solved. Now what was all that fuss about?
What fuss? I suggested in the OP that England should decide it's own path in it's own parliament without subsidising Scotland, Wales and NI - you appeared to have some issues with that.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by HelenConway
I think Scotland needs to have its independence ASAP. Hopefully this will happen, then the English at least will be more fairly represented in parliament and that will reduce the need for an exclusive English parliament actually.
Well well well - problem solved. Now what was all that fuss about?
Nope, I completely understand both. We must agree with my points in the OP then? Or is there some other issue you feel my contributions to this thread are inaccurately describing?
Originally posted by christina-66
I think you're confusing the West Lothian question and the Barnett Formula - they're not the same point.
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
reply to post by mbkennel
Well they've kind of got that in the form of the English Grand Committee, which is composed of all the members of the lower house of the Westminsterr parliament from English constituencies. It could be given it's own special legislative authority, becoming a de facto English parliament within the setting of the UK parliament. As Stumason suggested, the English tradition was for parliaments to meet across the Kingdom not just in Londres. The other tradition was for there to be long gaps between Parliaments, the MP's only being called to meet on a very irregular basis.
I think your suggestion is quite interesting.
Oh come on - I gave you a full response above. Take a look at it please. The West Lothian question was never resolved because the Scottish Executive came into being when the LABOUR party was in power in Westminster - they needed the Scottish Labour Mp's votes. It's not fair and it's not right (and I've already said that - now I've said it twice).
Come on lass - get the reading comprehension skills up to speed.
Lass? I'm a bloke. regardless, what are you saying now? The unjust funding of Scotland, Wales and NI by English taxpayers is Labours fault?! How silly is that? And again, I don't see Scottish people fighting for an equitable solution. They won't because they'll be skint without the workers of England propping their administration up.
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
reply to post by mbkennel
Well they've kind of got that in the form of the English Grand Committee, which is composed of all the members of the lower house of the Westminsterr parliament from English constituencies. It could be given it's own special legislative authority, becoming a de facto English parliament within the setting of the UK parliament. As Stumason suggested, the English tradition was for parliaments to meet across the Kingdom not just in Londres. The other tradition was for there to be long gaps between Parliaments, the MP's only being called to meet on a very irregular basis.
I think your suggestion is quite interesting.
Game playing is not appropriate or acceptable here, I am sure you totally understand my argument and my own knowledge of the issue at hand. Sticking to the point is a more preferable option than sidetracking.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by grainofsand
Oh come on - I gave you a full response above. Take a look at it please. The West Lothian question was never resolved because the Scottish Executive came into being when the LABOUR party was in power in Westminster - they needed the Scottish Labour Mp's votes. It's not fair and it's not right (and I've already said that - now I've said it twice).
Come on lass - get the reading comprehension skills up to speed.
Lass? I'm a bloke. regardless, what are you saying now? The unjust funding of Scotland, Wales and NI by English taxpayers is Labours fault?! How silly is that? And again, I don't see Scottish people fighting for an equitable solution. They won't because they'll be skint without the workers of England propping their administration up.
You are confusing because I post relating to the West Lothian question and why it was never resolved (the labour party's vested interests) and your reply was concerning the Barnett Formula ???