It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by HelenConway
system.
I've repeatedly stated my belief that we should abolish the party political system as it is outdated, unrepresentative and is clearly not working and implement radical reform of the electoral and parliamentary processes - unfortunately most people either don't give a toss or just like whinging and when it comes down to the nitty gritty they just haven't got the balls to do anything at all and by their inactivity support the status quo along with all it's inequalities and injustices.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by grainofsand
For me, no it shouldn't have it's own Parliament.
However, should the Union dissolve then yes, i think it should.
Simple one for me really, no grey areas (like there is with many other topics!).
Most people care that their lives are becoming harder - or more painful,
they just do not see any alternatives to our present system.
I think only about 30 percent of people voted in the last election.
I did NOT vote and I will not vote for the charlatans on offer.
I want my MP to have life experience, to have had a job in the real world, for starters.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by HelenConway
Too many people fought for our right to vote - personally I vote in as many elections etc as I can - but you must do as you see fit, but I've got to say that no vote is simply a vote for maintaining the status quo.
.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by HelenConway
Yes and i am fully aware of the West Lothian question. My position is simple, i support the Union - so no, no grey areas.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by HelenConway
We had 50,000 youths rioting last summer, all it did was provide more resolve for the government to make life even more difficult for them. Gone are the days where rioting gets you any diplomatic change, the only way to get the change you want is to get filthy rich and lobby the corrupt Eton Schoolboys at Westminster.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by JuniorDisco
I think you are being a bit melodramatic aren't you?
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by HelenConway
We had 50,000 youths rioting last summer, all it did was provide more resolve for the government to make life even more difficult for them. Gone are the days where rioting gets you any diplomatic change, the only way to get the change you want is to get filthy rich and lobby the corrupt Eton Schoolboys at Westminster.