It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mythfury
reply to post by slugger9787
A kid in high school could understand this.
Let's say someone wants to take it up with the Supreme Court and Overturn this decision of controlling guns. The Supreme court would look at their translation of the second amendment. A translation is what exactly? Would I be wrong to say that they changed it?? I doubt it. And unless you dont read that OFFICIAL TRANSLATION, you won't get far in saying the terms "militia" and "It's Unconstitutional", in a supreme court hearing. The Judge, is part of the cabinet, in which the president resides. He can then veto the previously signed orders for gun control. But noooo, You think you can skip the system made by your forefathers your'e trying to protect? Have fun sitting behind your screens, while your guns, as we speak, get CONSTITUTIONALLY taken away. If it's unconstitutional, and people in the military are supposed to protect the constitution, as are the people, why is nothing being done?
The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General.
the attorney general or attorney-general is the main legal advisor to the government
The executive branch executes the law
Originally posted by Mythfury
The attorney General isn't in the cabinet? Hmm. Whoops must have left that part out when they elected him?
What exactly are you trying to do. Bash me? or Debate?
the attorney general or attorney-general is the main legal advisor to the government
I mean, you just showed ridiculous you sounded when you even said that the branches of government that check off of each other include the judicial branch. Supreme Court is a part of the judicial branch. Using deductive reasoning, you can see that IF
The executive branch executes the law
That the president would have to, HAVE TO, look at the judicial branches, supreme court ruling on the official translation.
Again, what does your reply have anything to do with the constitutionality of it. Your telling us what is taught in high schools. Please elaborate on how im ignorant to reality, when at least I can properly answer questions.
Originally posted by Mythfury
Let's say someone wants to take it up with the Supreme Court and Overturn this decision of controlling guns.
The Supreme court would look at their translation of the second amendment. A translation is what exactly? Would I be wrong to say that they changed it?? I doubt it. And unless you dont read that OFFICIAL TRANSLATION, you won't get far in saying the terms "militia" and "It's Unconstitutional", in a supreme court hearing.
The Judge, is part of the cabinet, in which the president resides.
Originally posted by Mythfury
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Blah, blah, blah. I'm not a paralegal, but have college grad experience. Regardless, Is it constitutional or not? That was the MAIN premise of this. If you don't have anything to do beside try to dodge bullets and have a gun fight with me(metaphorical, course), then go play with your guns on another thread.
Originally posted by Mythfury
So in another thread, you use my examples like you know them? And state my case that you are denying here? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! I wish nothing but a happy life for you, because then you wouldn't notice how sad that is.
Likewise because the below....says nothing. You answered your own question without ever actually stating what that question is. Is what Constitutional?
Originally posted by Mythfury
Imma have to give it to you.
They changed the meaning, which unilateral would have been a better way of saying it in my case, to make it constitutional, amending the 2nd amendment.
Question is Is it constitutional, and since you won't even try, the answer is yes. You couldn't have said it more clearer in your most previous message. Okay? Go along with your life. Please.