What am I? Liberal or Conservative? Republican or Democrat?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 26-1-2013 @ 07:35 PM by rival
I'm having a hard time deciding where I fit in. I've been lumped in with "libtards"
and "right-wing gun nuts" and I'm just wondering is there anyone else like me who
doesn't "fit" the ready made mold of either party.

1. I'm pro-gun, pro 2nd amendment. I'll take it a step further, any "arms" your local
governments possess (Police, SWAT, FBI, DHS, ATF, etc) I believe the American people
have the right to possess.

2. I'm pro-woman. I think Roe vs Wade is just about right. The tough distinction to
make is the one between a mother's right to her body and when that right is superseded by
the fetus's right to life. IMO the existing law is just about as good as it gets.

3. I'm anti-social programs, like social medicine, social security, food stamps, and welfare.
I realize these programs are needed because sometimes circumstances dictate that some people
end up helpless and need a safety net, but I resist against these programs because, unchecked
these programs can become corrupt money pits of red tape and over-regulated government excess.

4. I'm pro-gay issues. Let them marry and have the benefit of validation AND the benefit of
the tax and insurance breaks hetero couples enjoy.

5. I believe in the total separation of church and state. Keep your god, your philosophy, and
your religion personal. No one should impose their religious views in a government
controlled venue. To each his own, in his own time.

6. I believe we should cut military spending. Drastically reduce the amount we spend on
defense, by at least half. It has become abundantly clear that we are no longer deploying
our military for defense. Over the last fifty years our military has been deployed in aggressive
action that has less to do with national defense and more to do with political and government
interest.

7. Go Green. I believe we, as a nation, should embrace solar and wind technology on a
large scale, complete with subsidy and tax incentive for new construction and retrofitted
existing structures, such as homes, schools, and businesses. Though I am against big
government and government subsidy of private sector this issue is too beneficial to
humanity for us to ignore. America should be writing the blueprint and leading the way.

I have other political views that I may express later, but that's enough for now to
pose my question...

So am I blue or am I red?





edit on 26-1-2013 by rival because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 07:49 PM by Swills
reply to post by rival



How about you don't put yourself in a useless box and just be you, a person who has their own opinions and beliefs that encompass the entire political spectrum.

Republicans and Democrats have proven themselves to be the same party. Think of them like WWE wrestling. They'll put on a dramatic show for the public but behind the scenes they obvious work for the same corporation. These politicians are liars, mostly corrupt, immoral, and absolutely greedy and will sell themselves out for a pittance.

Don't be a D or R, Conservative or Liberal, be you.
edit on 26-1-2013 by Swills because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 08:08 PM by rival
Originally posted by iwilliam
Congratulations, OP. You think seem to think for yourself at least enough to not have to follow some official party platform. You can make up your mind on individual issues, regardless of what the "conservative" or "liberal" position might be. Myself being what some might call a "pro-gun liberal" I find that to be awesome.

Seriously.

But that said... why feel the need to put any kind of label on yourself? That's part of their game.

If you're an independent thinker, you're better than that.

You're a free-thinker. There's your label. Enjoy it.


PS-- You should re-think your stance on the social programs, IMO. At least you don't sound extremist about it, like many. But some of those programs are filling some very real needs for a lot of people, and I am convinced things would not be better if they were done away with. Maybe reformed, somewhat.... but not gone. Other than that, you sound like my kind of thinker....


I don't really feel the need to pigeon-hole myself. This thread is really about showing that if
you to happen to fall between the cracks of political issues then that's okay...there are others like you.

As for the social programs, my stance is more like a doorman at a fancy nightclub. The guy who checks
the credentials of the clientele trying to enter. I think we are at full-capacity right now and I'm
worried about a fire hazard
edit on 26-1-2013 by rival because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 08:19 PM by WaterBottle
reply to post by bjax9er



Cutting military spending is liberal? Um no...it's actually fiscally conservative.


reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 08:26 PM by bjax9er
Originally posted by WaterBottle
reply to
post by bjax9er



Cutting military spending is liberal? Um no...it's actually fiscally conservative.


well excuse me!!

i was referring to this part as being liberal, especially when 90% of them vote for such wars.

It has become abundantly clear that we are no longer deploying our military for defense. Over the last fifty years our military has been deployed in aggressive action that has less to do with national defense and more to do with political and government interest.

but yes cut the fraud and unnecessary, is fiscally conservative.

edit on 26-1-2013 by bjax9er because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 08:30 PM by WaterBottle
reply to post by bjax9er



How is that liberal? A conservative would not want to establish an empire all over the world and engage in imperialism.

You're not a conservative, you're a neo-con.

edit on 26-1-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-1-2013 @ 08:38 PM by WaterBottle
reply to post by bjax9er



5. You really make no sense. The supreme court has ruled that separation of church and state is the law of the land repeatedly, the supreme court is granted power via the constitution. Until it is nullifyed, it stays. It is you who chooses what part of the constitution to like or not. The constitution nearly flat out says it anyway, so it's not changing unless the Christian Taliban takes the country by force and re-writes the constitution.

The term "Separation of Church and State" was coined by one of the founding fathers, while referring to what the 1rst amendment meant...


"Separation of church and state" (sometimes "wall of separation between church and state") is a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson and others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The phrase has since been repeatedly cited by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Jefferson wrote, "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.


en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 26-1-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Give Obama a Break! He Isn\'t All That Bad.
  Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags
Congress Is Fired
  Posted 13 days ago with 8 member flags
Why are Americans so scared of different Politcal Ideology
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags
Mitt or Barack? - Give me a break!
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
What Happens When Taxpayers Strike?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags