It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
After years of playing such numbers extremely close to the vest, Google today released figures spelling out exactly how much electricity the company’s massive computing resources consume. Its data centers continuously draw 260 million watts--roughly a quarter the output of a nuclear power plant, says the NYT--to keep services like Gmail, search, Google Ads, and YouTube up and running around the clock and around the globe.
How does that translate? Google also estimated that its total carbon emissions for 2010 were just below 1.5 million metric tons. Not all of Google’s electricity comes from carbon resources--a quarter comes from renewable fuels like wind, thanks to some deals the company has made with utilities--but that’s still some decent tonnage.
Still, Google argues that its consumption really isn’t so bad. Its data centers carry out billions of operations--a billion searches per day alone--and many of those save fuel. Google searches save trips to the library or the travel agent, for instance, offsetting the power consumed by its processing farms. And when you break it down it’s not so bad, considering the vast numbers of people using Google’s services. The company said an average user consumes just 180-watt hours per month, which roughly equates to running a 60-watt light bulb for three hours.
And how does that power usage break down? Google apparently didn’t detail every last watt, but it did say that search queries only burn 12.5 million of those 260 million watts.
If we're going to use energy, we might as well put it to a good use, and I think Google does that; it's not wasted resources because the service they provide is crucial to many aspects of modern life.
Google also released an estimate that an average search uses 0.3 watt-hours of electricity,
But we can't live without the www can we.
Originally posted by sligtlyskeptical
The majority of that power is probably used to deliver advertising, which annoys the hell out of me. i still have ads being delivered for stuff I searched for months ago and already bought. A complete waste of resources.
I also think it is fallacy to think that people ordering stuff one item at a time is anything but a waste of resources. More convenient? Yes, but good for us as a whole ? No.
Google does help us find information, however that information is almost exclusively created by others. I think it would be much better to have a non profit group index the internet instead of google.
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
If we're going to use energy, we might as well put it to a good use, and I think Google does that; it's not wasted resources because the service they provide is crucial to many aspects of modern life.
Google also released an estimate that an average search uses 0.3 watt-hours of electricity,
What is one crucial aspect of modern life that google provides?
That's absurd...
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by winofiend
What is one crucial aspect of modern life that google provides?
That's absurd...
Information. Information organization.
Lots of it.
They are not the only ones. But that doesn't negate their contribution.
Calling it a crucial aspect is underselling.edit on 26-1-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)