Originally posted by OldSkullJedi
reply to post by Hefficide
When folks begin quoting the constitution; remember this is a good blueprint initially; however, times change. We are not living 300 years ago, blacks
are not slaves and we can't keep pointing to a document written so long ago it is not applicable for the 21st Century. We DO NOT need assault style
weapons. The term ASSAULT denotes a weapon which is to be used for what? There ya go, now you're thinking like a 21st Century Citizen. If you like to
hunt, there are HUNTING weapons available. Well regulated Militia? For what... to overthrow the government? That's paranoid thinking. If you knew
anything about virology; you may understand that not a single bullet will defeat "IF the government wanted to" a single germ. It's simple logic
really. No, the answer is no, we don't need assault weapons, and if you have better logic than mine, please, bring it to the table. Wanna live by a
300 year old document? Go back in time with Mr. Titor and live in a world where the color of your skin dictated your worth as a human being in a land
bought and sold by wealthy sociopathes who lacked empathy and compassion. Low frequency thinkers if you will.
disgusting. what country do you live in?
the constitution is the founding document of this nation, and IS STILL the supreme law of the land...it is not some nostalgic document from antiquity
that is quoted for the hell of it...it is quoted, constantly, as a reminder, because it is the law...too many people have forgotten that..
the constitution is JUST as applicable today, as it was the day it was written. the principles of liberty, human rights, and equal justice under law
are NEVER outdated concepts...unless you're a communist, or a fan of fascism
you've obviously never read the constitution and bill of rights...if you're not a citizen of these united states, then that's completely
understandable...if you ARE a citizen, then shame on you....it is all laid out in perfectly understandable language exactly what each item in the bill
of rights is for, what it means, and is completely impossible to misunderstand, so long as you posses sufficient intelligence to read, and comprehend.
I say everything in this paragraph, because you seem to not be understanding what the items mean...
given your ignorance of firearms, and willingness to lap up the MSM's kool-aid about "scary black assault guns", im sure there's no way to get you
to listen to reason...i can only hope that you would be willing to engage me in intelligent debate on the topic, that i might help you to understand
i still believe your above statements show a level of ignorance, and naivete that is dangerous..