reply to post by Logarock
but there have been many many threads on the 2nd and I cant remember one time a person saying they were some shade of left but didnt support the
current weapons ban proposal.
I would suggest you simply didn't see them for whatever reason.
I watch carefully and my gut tells me this vain of thinking is simply a new twist to the left stratagem
It's lovely that you think you can define us better than we can define ourselves. Indulge us; What is our stratagem? I don't feel particularly
now that they have seen how hard headed the 2nd amendment supporters are they are trying to find the proper tone with witch to sway those crazy gun
Gosh. Busted! You are quite clever to see through the ruse, that 'we' can't possibly support the Constitution or the 2nd amendment. Thank-you again
for defining us as we're clearly either incapable or deceptive. I'm not sure whether to feel guilty, exposed or stupid... can you tell me which I'm
supposed to feel?
I obviously severely underestimated your ability to read minds and to see how we vote, what we write to our Senators and Representatives about, what
we talk to our friends and families about and amongst ourselves.
How silly of me to try to show the fallacies of assumption and the demonization of would be allies. Should my next thread subject be repealing the 2nd
in order to coddle such fallacies er I mean admit such truths?
I can understand that some liberals would seek a sort of absolution for their departure from the foundations of the republic and that insurance to our
liberites the constitution.
Seeking absolution? My, my... you really think we're quite evil don't you? Can you outline our departure? And again, which are we? Stupid and mislead,
evil and manipulative liars, or are we now contrite and sorry for the error of our ways?
The noble quest that has been the foundation of every rise to power of every bloodsucking mass killer form Hitler to Pot
Your point of bringing up Dictators of extreme Right ideologies is what? Oh dear, the words Communist and Socialist confused you, didn't they?
Considering the lame results that background checks have demonstrated thus far in their efforts to keep guns out of the hands of felons, that such an
argument would be considered in the realm of reasonable discusion only shows that logic has escaped from our grasp here.
Can you qualify that statement?
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
Anarchists promote Chaos from Order
Even though this is off topic, somethings just can't go ignored. What is it with the majority on the political forums of this site, telling people
what they think and feel... insisting on defining people outside of their own ideologies instead of recognizing them or taking them at face value? You
can disagree with what we think and feel without condemning us as mislead or liars.
Hmm... What do Anarchists do after they Win their Hard Fought Revolution ?
....Put away their XBox and go to Bed.........
What revolutions are you referring to? I really think that if you are going to enter a thread that is in part discussing an Anarchist view on an issue
and simply just attack Anarchism, you really should be better versed.
Do you disagree with the essay I provided an excerpt of, written by an Anarchist on the topic of gun control? His stance is that there shouldn't be
ANY gun control.
reply to post by ecoparity
See directly above.
reply to post by beezzer
I know you were trying to be a nice guy here, I'm not trying to pick on you though it may come across what way. This isn't something to say thank-you
for and in fact it's a bit patronizing to do so. This is a personal issue above all else. It isn't a left/right issue, it isn't a liberal/conservative
issue but by continuing these assumptions we are allowing it to be a democrat/republican issue and thus it serves to keep us hating each other and
I reject the notion of token liberals and token leftists in order to prove one doesn't categorically reject. "She's a _____ but not like them other
ones"... sound familiar?
edit on 27-1-2013 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)