Originally posted by Human_Alien
Ah geeze. We're losing all the pioneers in this once controversial subject!
Well I'd say the UFO subject is still a controversial one mate and there are plenty of opinions as to UFO origin but you're right about the
importance of getting young people interested and involved.
Atmospherical physicist Dr James E. Mcdonald once said that after running through all the various hypotheses ie: psychological, advanced technology,
hoax, poorly understood geophysical phenomena etc.. he was left with "the seemingly absurd, seemingly improbable hypothesis that these things may be
coming from somewhere else" and I tend to agree with him about
some of these objects not being us.
Whether it's the extra-terrestrial hypothesis, the extra-dimensional hypothesis, the crypto-terrestrial hypothesis etc.. I also think that until
there's some unequivocable proof in the public domain as to the true nature of UFOs then the only honest answer is 'I don't know'.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
To those who spent time studying this phenomenon...we know without a doubt they are real so now it's up to you to keep the truth alive
Well I'd definitely agree that UFOs are real (and not visionary or fictitious) -they appear on radar screens, cause EM effects on machinery and even
leave physical trace evidence so, to me, the 'socio-psychological' explanation propounded by certain debunkers is complete bollocks.
The high percentage of actual unknown UFO reports mentioned by George in the first quote is also a very important factor and he certainly wasn't
alone in thinking it 'unacceptable'.
"The opposite conclusion could have been drawn from The Condon Report's content, namely, that a phenomenon with such a high ratio of
unexplained cases (about 30 percent) should arouse sufficient scientific curiosity to continue its study. From a scientific and engineering
standpoint, it is unacceptable to simply ignore substantial numbers of unexplained observations.
Ronald D Story - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics UFO Subcommittee
Official UFO Unexplained Report Percentages
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Thanks Mr Fawcett...you truly led the way for many. We'll see you on the flip-side!
He sure did mate and was apparently a very nice man as well -he discusses some intriguing UFO incidents in the article below and also brings up a
connection to the Atomic Energy Commission which I thought interesting as there's a 1950 news article
here which also states the AEC wants information on flying saucers and are
questioning witnesses about factors like UFO propulsion, luminosity and odour.
We are reminded of a statement made by General Nathan F. Twining of the Army Air Forces (the original UFO study Project Sign) in 1947 forty
years ago. General Twining said,
"all pertinent data would be made available to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)."
link
Cheers.