It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Big difference between 16289 and 100000 huh?
Originally posted by marg6043
Edsinger I wonder who pays your salary I bet you are under bushes payroll, they way you post and defend him, knowing very well what he has done to the people of Iraq, and to us the people of this nation.
I hope the salary is worth it.
not. Not according to my news sources.
Originally posted by edsinger
So its all Bush's Fault huh?
Well it just tells me how your mind works. We get 3000 dead and you are mad that we took the war to them.
Maybe you can be Kerry's secretary and write that sternly worded memo the next time we are attacked.
Cant you get it? We WOULD have been attacked even if GORE won.
Originally posted by netbound
It�s funny to me that we never hear about this side of the �War on Terrorism�.
If an invading force occupied LA and killed 100,000 citizens, trying to �round up� a few bad guys, I�d consider them terrorist, predatory animals with no value for human life!
IMHO, us Americans could use an attitude adjustment �
Originally posted by Fu Manchu
And the War College at West Point is still teaching French military strategy to US cadets today!
Originally posted by Fu Manchu
1] Who says the US has captured Saddam? The US claims it, but Saddam's wife & independent analysis of Saddam's teeth vs. the teeth of the guy they're holding say: "That's not Saddam." Maybe one of his known doubles??
The UK Government will "examine with very great care" claims around 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the US-led invasion, Jack Straw has said.
A study in the Lancet said the majority of the victims were women and children killed due to military activity.
The UK foreign secretary told the BBC's Today programme that another independent estimate of civilian deaths was around 15,000.
The study by US and Iraq researchers was led by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, US.
It said poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of violence" had led to the deaths in Iraq.
The risk of death from violence for civilians in Iraq was now 58 times higher than before the war, it said.
Originally posted by J0HNSmith
I love how this is front page stuff for Ruters, the AP, abc, CNN. But ATS won't even put it up as a news story. Makes you think that there's a little bias here against the facts by some of the mods.
LONDON (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed in violence since the U.S.-led invasion last year, American public health experts have calculated in a report that estimates there were 100,000 "excess deaths" in 18 months.