originally posted by: ErosA433
ignore the questions or statements i made
wich arent part of the topic at all, as mary stated multiple times.
I grew up a long time ago and another thing to add to the list of 'Things to find in a thread that shows lack of substance is'
everyone whos enjoyed a couple of your posts will most likely disagree...
I understand more about Physics than most people
correction: youve learned the stuff your profs told you, and blatantly ignore even rock solid evidence that contradicts your narrowminded belief
system, wich imo belongs to church really.
given I have a PhD on the subject
quoted from another thread: "I am a physicist who is working on a Direct Dark matter experiment."
you are way too far from an objective POV to draw any unbiased conclusions.
you even defended the claim earth would be made of DM bc it doesent shine like the friggin sun!
yet you claim to posess the "ultimate knowledge" even tho its obvious that your informational basis is more than just "flawed"
hf reading and think of how "ultimate" sciences understanding really is.
1) Oh well study at university is your problem, 'they' have trained you not to think
your own posts pretty much validate that. ive never seen you do anything that involves thinking.
all you ever do is quote spoonfed information, and i have never seen you draw any conclusions yourself.
so, yeah, you have been obviously trained not to think.
2) You are not interested in the real truth, just the lies 'they' tell you
again, forgot to enabe your brains before posting?
its guys like you who only consider one theory valid, while the "new age weirdos" look at the whole picture.
that description perfectly matches yourself if anything.
3) You know nothing,
"we" are aware that we know little to nothing. its your tremendous arrogance claiming to have found the "ultimate truth with no critique allowed".
now that is over with, yes I understand that the strong force thing is an analogy made to convince you of an idea, but the analogy doesn't even
remotely work, and overlaying no amount of graphics really adds credibility into the idea.
the assumption is that flowing currents generate theese fields, wich resemble vorticies.
and in case you arent aware of it(wich im pretty sure of by now), systems of multiple vorticies form more complex systems with just ONE outter flow
looki looki www.youtube.com...
Also, science does partially understand bow shock and the formation of some of these objects on the basis of our already understood
your attitude really sucks dude, bow shock is a purely hypothetical thing that is totally unprooven.
yet you, as usual, imply it would be a totally prooven fact.
wich is a pretty good analogy to your actual understanding, and the resistance in terms of looking into any info not matching what you think "must be
As i said in the other thread regarding this subject, I told you that radio waves can be used to probe magnetic field lines in galaxies. So
please take a look at the information presented here
funny (ill quote): "Magnetic fields are essential for the onset of star formation"
wanst it GRAVITY and GRAVITY only?! wheres the press article that admits the "new age weirdos" were right all along?
another perfect example for the selfrighteousness of your likes.
There is a clear represenation of a galaxy that is side on, the magnetic field inferred does not follow this shape that is pointed out, more
over it is extended below and above the disk but is irregular.
i personally find it shocking that a "professional scientist" cant even picture such a simple thing as 2-3 vorticies acting uppon each other.
i suggest you watch the above link, and once your finished crying, reevaluate how you "know everything" after you realized how blatantly you failed in
this simple task.
I said in the other thread that I am very very interested in many ideas and theories
when words and actions differ that much, its not really raising ones credibility.
The motto of ATS is apparently Deny Ignorance... well please, deny ignorance and look at a wide veriaty of evidence.
yes please, have a look at the evidence. you clearly didnt watch anything witch an open mind thats considered "fringe" by your coworkers.
Spending 40mins of your time to get all his theories and then not even spending 10mins to read the stand point of the scientific community is
quite frankly evidence of vast ignorance.
again, see the above linked video. theres no need in following ones arguing if the fundamental statement theese arguments are built on is rubbish.
Appologies if you take this as an insult, it is not intended to be... i am simply asking the two people here who appear to nod yes in unison to
each other to open your eyes and minds in the same way as you have asked us to also.
read your own writings again and you may figure HOW insulting they actually are.
yes they are nodding, and thats particulary thanks to guys like you, providing arguments that make no sense at a closer look, thus raising
allso see vorticies acting uppon each other...
I opened my eyes and mind, saw nothing that i would say is evidence that science is totally wrong on magnetic field and structure of all
ok, how come science was not aware of the (as lapoint labels them) confinement dome, flipring, chokering etc?
how can you still claim to have understood magetism even ona basic level if you werent aware of some of its BASIC properties?
again, raising suspicion.
I have provided a few questions back and I am hoping to get the same respectful questions back or at least discussion. I tried it in the last
thread, I am trying it here also.
i quite frankly did not see any questions, only half biased arguing on how this has to be incorrect and how everyone considering it has to be
edit on 19-7-2014 by Dolour because: moar typos